From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J52AV-0004LK-1t for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:53:15 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id lBJGqLak030571; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:52:21 GMT Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lBJGoLYE028216 for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:50:22 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 341008D306 for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:53:47 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at ferdyx.org Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno.ferdyx.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xGRRc0DlQr9A for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:53:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from posidon.ferdyx.org (posidon.ferdyx.org [192.168.0.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 733F58D305 for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:53:45 +0100 (CET) Received: by posidon.ferdyx.org (nbSMTP-1.01-cvs) for uid 1000 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) ferdy@gentoo.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:50:19 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:50:19 +0100 From: "Fernando J. Pereda" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI) Message-ID: <20071219165019.GB4601@ferdyx.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <200712172320.01988.peper@gentoo.org> <20071218195937.GD4423@ferdyx.org> <47692A3B.2010406@gentoo.org> <200712191544.17923.peper@gentoo.org> <47693601.4080103@gentoo.org> <20071219154000.GA4601@ferdyx.org> <20071219110354.51f8275c@altair.jimramsay.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4bRzO86E/ozDv8r1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071219110354.51f8275c@altair.jimramsay.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-Archives-Salt: 799fd57d-2c1d-41c3-95b3-166223ac7551 X-Archives-Hash: e9af32527a70956c5c8ced4986983f7a --4bRzO86E/ozDv8r1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 11:03:54AM -0500, Jim Ramsay wrote: > "Fernando J. Pereda" wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 04:17:21PM +0100, Luca Barbato wrote: > > > Piotr Jaroszy=C5=84ski wrote: > > > > Mixing EAPIs can't work. > > >=20 > > > Why? > >=20 > > Because EAPIs can define colliding features. >=20 > The sense I've gotten from this discussion so far is that if you want > features from two EAPIs you know *can* be combined without collisions, > you should define a third EAPI that is a superset of the other 2. *nod* But that is different from arbitrary mixing them, which is what originated this subthread. - ferdy --=20 Fernando J. Pereda Garcimart=C3=ADn 20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4 --4bRzO86E/ozDv8r1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHaUvLCkhbDGC9KNQRAmmFAKCHSYSjITLZpFO/hanS017x0Eo5FQCdFtSV HZ4hqV4LzL+CYcRj5LLfBcA= =RbN9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4bRzO86E/ozDv8r1-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list