From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J3BwE-0003IW-19 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:54:54 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id lBEEs0Qe009200; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:54:00 GMT Received: from hs-out-2122.google.com (hs-out-0708.google.com [64.233.178.248]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lBEEq6KY006905 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:52:07 GMT Received: by hs-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 23so1834231hsn.2 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 06:52:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent:sender; bh=YNFW+KqC1Zb2HmmnHIrTg/E/8gWb3e26Gu2BKDefxRs=; b=owjX7fyEGUcvGBpXwL74dQaQGQO5TEfbRtprNq9fyRU+bI7+upFbdbjQcuMlRGixV2i7hcHYh+lkVbgXZX1Tfq4EAepOP16SxdEXis6kGGpFMgNH79FwgzYvQ2AJXJIbtmvgyRnqlC0jKFQ37++kQdJPrghdqWr3ZKpdi07B+dc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent:sender; b=EMOCxJ5lFNU0v4KZQFrIp61cdmKVLaEIA39rJd9NEYCseinxZGrN4OawumKiipUGmaMIownaZnvUn7za9HJ4q0/8ZtJr9oXBXEQeQsnJkZuhKm597u0tjavEvg+8NfxzWiAsHW/LzmUjHY1A2O9DgHnwFuka1zrr+dk05g6q+ek= Received: by 10.142.11.2 with SMTP id 2mr234486wfk.233.1197643925139; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 06:52:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from mejis.cold-front ( [24.63.115.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i20sm9257643wxd.2007.12.14.06.52.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 14 Dec 2007 06:52:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by mejis.cold-front (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EBB495404A; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 09:53:35 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 09:53:35 -0500 From: Justin Bronder To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-x86 commit in sys-cluster/openmpi: ChangeLog openmpi-1.1.1.ebuild openmpi-1.2.4.ebuild Message-ID: <20071214145335.GA16123@mejis.cold-front> References: <20071213091812.GM31432@supernova> <1197627875.24412.2.camel@vega.lnet> <47627362.7050902@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47627362.7050902@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: Justin Bronder X-Archives-Salt: 22d16c3a-f67b-4e43-8762-93712ff578d9 X-Archives-Hash: d7d9e652970d1cb06354329c1757aace --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 14/12/07 12:13 +0000, S=E9bastien Fabbro wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 >=20 > On 14/12/07 10:24, Matthias Langer wrote: > >> On 02:10 Thu 13 Dec , Justin Bronder (jsbronder) wrote: > >>> 1.1 sys-cluster/openmpi/openmpi-1.2.4.ebuild > >>> > >>> file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-cluster/op= enmpi/openmpi-1.2.4.ebuild?rev=3D1.1&view=3Dmarkup > >>> plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-cluster/op= enmpi/openmpi-1.2.4.ebuild?rev=3D1.1&content-type=3Dtext/plain > >=20 > > Why have you removed the "ifc" USE flag (as well as a few others), that > > was present in the ebuilds that can still be found at bug 166787? >=20 > For icc and f90-typesafe, I advised him to do so on #gentoo-science. >=20 > ifc/icc use flags should be avoided (see bug #97929). > Disabling f90-typesafe did not make much sense as a use flag once you > have the fortran one enabled, but why --with-mpi-f90-size=3Dmedium" > and "--with-f90-max-array-dim=3D4" disappeared I don't know. For the first, chalk this up to my own inexperience with fortran. Is this going to be common enough to justify a USE flag? Would it be better to just enable it by default when gfortran is not being used given that is slows compilation down significantly? In the case of the latter, that is the default when no options are passed. > For the gm and gx flags, I don't know, and there is still a nocxx one. There are no ebuilds for the above packages. I submitted them at the same time I commented on the openmpi bug, but no longer have access to that hardware. If someone does and would be willing to work with me on finishing up those ebuilds, please contact me. --=20 Justin Bronder --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHYpjs4MrvBE1wQ8kRAjSuAKCmREEztM86Hkb6SZ9XmNkCRNj83ACeMmH7 9GYWZRKqdS/HE8AqPJO0pPk= =yMtw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list