From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J1iGq-0008Iy-JW for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:02:05 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id lBAD1E4m003361; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:01:14 GMT Received: from mail.goodpoint.de (tori.goodpoint.de [85.10.203.41]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lBACxPpO032092 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:59:25 GMT Received: from joel.lan (i59F73B2C.versanet.de [89.247.59.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.goodpoint.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0691F108952; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:59:25 +0100 (CET) From: Robert Buchholz To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] scm package version suffix Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:59:23 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 Cc: "Nirbheek Chauhan" References: <200712091701.50364.peper@gentoo.org> <20071210071826.465f7bff@blueyonder.co.uk> <8b4c83ad0712092344k713552fdqb59472abaf52dbd8@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8b4c83ad0712092344k713552fdqb59472abaf52dbd8@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2236160.R1CtNtUpe4"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200712101359.23196.rbu@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 1f4ff8cc-8859-4d3f-9bca-b16a19cbd1da X-Archives-Hash: c52771eba6a00e753c9e04664bcdb185 --nextPart2236160.R1CtNtUpe4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday, 10. December 2007, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > Why not just have something like > sys-devel/gcc-4.2.3_p20071127-scm_b${BRANCHNAME}-r1 ? 1) You cannot define a total order on those names: Is maa/moo-3-scm_bONECOOLFEATURE < maa/moo-3-scm_bOTHERCOOLFEATURE ? 2) It will break updating from the feature branch, once you installed: sys-devel/gcc-4.2.3_p20071127-scm_b${BRANCHNAME}-r1 and sys-devel/gcc-4.2.4 comes out, it'll update to that, regardless of the inclusion of=20 ${BRANCHNAME}'s feature. Regards, Robert --nextPart2236160.R1CtNtUpe4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBHXTgryZx3L/ph1soRAjrHAKC/I0LsenzamY2lGIxxmdzNlaYXlwCfX9wR n0BL8dotKbbrrj5yiXaGysM= =nuxE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2236160.R1CtNtUpe4-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list