From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J1eHz-0005eI-JC for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 08:47:00 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id lBA8k9Qp015916; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 08:46:09 GMT Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lBA8i9Jl013450 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 08:44:09 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C29E88D306 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:46:14 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at ferdyx.org Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno.ferdyx.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HJ4csStR8qKy for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:46:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (unknown [213.121.151.206]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 116D58D305 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:46:11 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 08:44:02 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] scm package version suffix Message-ID: <20071210084402.5d34308c@blueyonder.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20071210083604.GG14557@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> References: <200712091701.50364.peper@gentoo.org> <475C37C7.8010201@gentoo.org> <20071209185745.2baa293d@blueyonder.co.uk> <20071210043146.GE4162@supernova> <20071210071826.465f7bff@blueyonder.co.uk> <8b4c83ad0712092344k713552fdqb59472abaf52dbd8@mail.gmail.com> <20071210082427.503cf5a1@blueyonder.co.uk> <20071210083604.GG14557@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.1.0 (GTK+ 2.12.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/NC7gCWNvmZdyV/e2GyknZRL"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 2c14262b-d876-4397-81e2-e3de53876751 X-Archives-Hash: bd58939f5b0b7767639c79e777a0e29c --Sig_/NC7gCWNvmZdyV/e2GyknZRL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:36:04 -0800 "Robin H. Johnson" wrote: > On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 08:24:27AM +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > mypkg-scm > One devil's advocate question for now. > Regardless of which suffix we pick, given that it is a well-known > suffix, what will be the expected behavior when PN =3D 'foo-scm'? There isn't a problem. There is never any need to work out whether something is a cat/pkg or a cat/pkg-ver (things have been carefully designed that way -- in cases where either is valid, the -ver form always has an operator too, and all operators require a version). You'd simply have foo-scm-scm. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/NC7gCWNvmZdyV/e2GyknZRL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHXPxS96zL6DUtXhERAn9jAJsHO4v7AY0IaZwqcdIEJDD8VjtBKwCg2g8e d3AU/BsYe69LiY0CTEwqDNM= =Xhit -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/NC7gCWNvmZdyV/e2GyknZRL-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list