From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-27785-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1IxUJy-0004y6-4h
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 21:19:50 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id lASLIvDI020935;
	Wed, 28 Nov 2007 21:18:57 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lASLFtfm016366
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 21:15:55 GMT
Received: from gentoo.org (c-67-171-150-177.hsd1.or.comcast.net [67.171.150.177])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A196656AC
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 21:15:54 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:15:53 -0800
From: Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Features and documentation
Message-ID: <20071128211553.GB11126@supernova>
References: <20071127192144.GP4368@supernova> <b41005390711271910n74d15a96w16681f40294a5fa@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <b41005390711271910n74d15a96w16681f40294a5fa@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
X-Archives-Salt: 2d83a4cc-8ee2-48b3-bb73-222a9afaa785
X-Archives-Hash: 6d533b6fc06040f200edecf1af6056c3

On 19:10 Tue 27 Nov     , Alec Warner wrote:
> No, because this is not a realistic requirement, it's an ideal case.
> People will just commit changes without documentation anyway.

Here's my understanding of what you said: Because people will break 
rules and violate standards, we shouldn't have any.

Is that accurate?

Thanks,
Donnie
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list