From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IxUJy-0004y6-4h for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 21:19:50 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id lASLIvDI020935; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 21:18:57 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lASLFtfm016366 for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 21:15:55 GMT Received: from gentoo.org (c-67-171-150-177.hsd1.or.comcast.net [67.171.150.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A196656AC for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 21:15:54 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:15:53 -0800 From: Donnie Berkholz To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Features and documentation Message-ID: <20071128211553.GB11126@supernova> References: <20071127192144.GP4368@supernova> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-Archives-Salt: 2d83a4cc-8ee2-48b3-bb73-222a9afaa785 X-Archives-Hash: 6d533b6fc06040f200edecf1af6056c3 On 19:10 Tue 27 Nov , Alec Warner wrote: > No, because this is not a realistic requirement, it's an ideal case. > People will just commit changes without documentation anyway. Here's my understanding of what you said: Because people will break rules and violate standards, we shouldn't have any. Is that accurate? Thanks, Donnie -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list