From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-27744-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1Iwblj-0003T2-9E
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2007 11:04:52 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id lAQB407N027967;
	Mon, 26 Nov 2007 11:04:00 GMT
Received: from mail.isohunt.com (b01.ext.isohunt.com [208.71.112.51])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lAQB238s025557
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 26 Nov 2007 11:02:04 GMT
Received: (qmail 22692 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2007 11:02:00 -0000
Received: from S010600022af11287.vc.shawcable.net (HELO curie.orbis-terrarum.net) (24.85.154.166)
  (smtp-auth username robbat2@isohunt.com, mechanism login)
  by mail.isohunt.com (qpsmtpd/0.33-dev on beta01) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA; Mon, 26 Nov 2007 11:02:00 +0000
Received: (qmail 18797 invoked by uid 10000); 26 Nov 2007 03:01:58 -0800
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 03:01:58 -0800
From: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] maintainer-wanted bugcount
Message-ID: <20071126110158.GG14557@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net>
References: <474A95E4.6000906@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Fnm8lRGFTVS/3GuM"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <474A95E4.6000906@gentoo.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
X-Archives-Salt: e54286be-0393-411d-b9d2-d8fbb137db07
X-Archives-Hash: 466e84ffd7402a59fe2894554903152c


--Fnm8lRGFTVS/3GuM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 10:46:12AM +0100, Markus Ullmann wrote:
> As I highly doubt this will happen within a week, we have to make a
> decision how to proceed with this stuff. So what options do we have?
> These come to mind:
d) In addition to c), keep them open, flagged with sunrise in the status
   board, so that when a developer does want some package not in the
   tree, they can search first.
e) Encourage existing developers to review and commit this stuff more
   often.

I really would not want to see them closed unless there is a good reason
for them to not be committed to the tree.

--=20
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux Developer & Infra Guy
E-Mail     : robbat2@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP   : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED  F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85

--Fnm8lRGFTVS/3GuM
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Robbat2 @ Orbis-Terrarum Networks - The text below is a digital signature. If it doesn't make any sense to you, ignore it.

iD8DBQFHSqemPpIsIjIzwiwRAjvTAJ4sl3gCS5Je4OrFoMhc3n0Xcb97DACg3OHh
TquEC1znrICgeUdp72+MA+g=
=shDn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Fnm8lRGFTVS/3GuM--
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list