From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IqrAn-0002HQ-5a for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 14:18:57 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id lAAEHw9m009962; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 14:17:58 GMT Received: from mo-p07-ob.rzone.de (mo-p07-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.188]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lAAEFv0j007337 for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 14:15:58 GMT Received: from localhost (u-5-184.vpn.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.101.184]) by post.webmailer.de (mrclete mo31) (RZmta 14.0) with ESMTP id e026d7jAA9pq8z for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 15:15:56 +0100 (MET) (envelope-from: ) Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 15:16:24 +0100 From: Christian Faulhammer To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: USE flag transition: tetex and latex Message-ID: <20071110151624.717eacfb@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20071107091303.39fe70e9@toz.strangled.net> References: <20071031080355.198fa5d3@gentoo.org> <20071031113819.1a7f4a8a@toz.strangled.net> <20071106141327.176c2b65@gentoo.org> <20071107091303.39fe70e9@toz.strangled.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/uvoCPRjSxh_i0MQ.rkSo5nW"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-RZG-AUTH: hXn+rC1arvT7Lf9I/zKDqjrgIkrokD1Qxy5bIqfbp9I10BMNL35Kum+fVbT8+ijLtsxAGXO51Ok= X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo07 X-Archives-Salt: 27892ffc-71f3-45b1-a415-3db361c0965f X-Archives-Hash: 8d3b001ce9cd01ec0e66c11f890048a3 --Sig_/uvoCPRjSxh_i0MQ.rkSo5nW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alexis Ballier : > Hi, >=20 > > Yes, we should introduce tex, latex and kpathsea USE flags. > > Anyone? > +1 for latex & kpathsea. How/when do we start ? :) I'd say start > moving useflags on a per package basis, making them local for now. > Once there are enough, let us move to a global one. Once this is > finished, let us deprecate the tetex useflag. Ok, Gnuplot is being done by me and we will do it gradually...maybe open a tracker bug to collect all this, as have been done with USE=3Dtcltk/tcl/tk, qt/qt3/qt4 and gtk/gtk2? First, collect all packages having latex/tetex/tex USE flags and check if actions are needed, then cc maintainers and give them some weeks to rework it. =20 > +0.5 for tex: it's a good idea, but I dont know about any package > using only tex and not latex (and where it would be optional). > Perhaps I'm wrong there. Let's decide on a per package basis. V-Li --=20 Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project , #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode --Sig_/uvoCPRjSxh_i0MQ.rkSo5nW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHNb04NQqtfCuFneMRAiNzAJ92CLTcc9PoQ91EZWz6dgguh0xeHACfTdwO aoOh9sAoXLL2/R7VdTTf8gQ= =swgw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/uvoCPRjSxh_i0MQ.rkSo5nW-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list