From: Christian Faulhammer <opfer@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: USE flag transition: tetex and latex
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 15:16:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071110151624.717eacfb@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071107091303.39fe70e9@toz.strangled.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1147 bytes --]
Alexis Ballier <aballier@gentoo.org>:
> Hi,
>
> > Yes, we should introduce tex, latex and kpathsea USE flags.
> > Anyone?
> +1 for latex & kpathsea. How/when do we start ? :) I'd say start
> moving useflags on a per package basis, making them local for now.
> Once there are enough, let us move to a global one. Once this is
> finished, let us deprecate the tetex useflag.
Ok, Gnuplot is being done by me and we will do it gradually...maybe
open a tracker bug to collect all this, as have been done with
USE=tcltk/tcl/tk, qt/qt3/qt4 and gtk/gtk2?
<URL:https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137785>
First, collect all packages having latex/tetex/tex USE flags and check
if actions are needed, then cc maintainers and give them some weeks to
rework it.
> +0.5 for tex: it's a good idea, but I dont know about any package
> using only tex and not latex (and where it would be optional).
> Perhaps I'm wrong there.
Let's decide on a per package basis.
V-Li
--
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
<URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode
<URL:http://www.faulhammer.org/>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-10 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-31 7:03 [gentoo-dev] USE flag transition: tetex and latex Christian Faulhammer
2007-10-31 10:38 ` Alexis Ballier
2007-11-01 8:10 ` [gentoo-dev] " Steve Long
2007-11-06 13:13 ` Christian Faulhammer
2007-11-06 14:42 ` Tobias Klausmann
2007-11-06 14:46 ` Christian Faulhammer
2007-11-06 16:44 ` Tobias Klausmann
2007-11-07 8:13 ` Alexis Ballier
2007-11-10 14:16 ` Christian Faulhammer [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-11-07 13:09 Ferris McCormick
2007-11-10 2:03 ` Robert Buchholz
2007-11-10 11:04 ` Alexis Ballier
2007-11-10 14:12 ` Christian Faulhammer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071110151624.717eacfb@gentoo.org \
--to=opfer@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox