From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IpdhK-0002Co-O3 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 05:43:31 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id lA75gfSM017488; Wed, 7 Nov 2007 05:42:41 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lA75eo2u015052 for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2007 05:40:51 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19AFB65456; Wed, 7 Nov 2007 05:40:49 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-apps/paludis: ChangeLog paludis-0.26.0_alpha3.ebuild Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 01:40:48 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 Cc: "Piotr =?utf-8?q?Jaroszy=C5=84ski?=" , "Donnie Berkholz" References: <20071105180429.GG25343@supernova> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1952115.3Hjl9r0vvn"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200711070040.48744.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 950e5cb2-1faa-4223-ab46-cf8cc1b81641 X-Archives-Hash: 2f74b86565c3979332c049d7672ab0a1 --nextPart1952115.3Hjl9r0vvn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 06 November 2007, Piotr Jaroszy=C5=84ski wrote: > On 05/11/2007, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > Shouldn't need to create a user twice, and that quoting makes this a bit > > harder to read than it needs to be. > > Since which version of portage it's handled correctly? since when did it fail ... ive never heard of pkg_* funcs not being run=20 properly =2Dmike --nextPart1952115.3Hjl9r0vvn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARzFP4EFjO5/oN/WBAQLn2w//Zslx06mz29wg6g6O85r2BjPrMZ4iCABw BnWaI44aCdFFNjnWER+gGloZR7rS+ouC4TrlSsonmTeqIhaCBeUVFlW4KdB8NwzD CYOhOAQliclzSu5bRzHx83UloDzS5OwCsKJcyY552ZTaFNzodmnQPa7LI0P1wwnr Pe5OFH+VeuCKBsRWSq5KA2I/b1i75RZ1mjwyRFLCZ2tkeMuaYWjv+sz3XgQAU8up Rp4sAiizz+IQ175LJx9nNlOiiFrHTvITjWoDwpPj+FTUYrrPCgfpKcnvppAvgnPJ z5L3O+YhtweNlVzJmmpbi9B1em8WA7nWT4m38cfZCwOlFXKoaHZRqLewuStwGMcp M8Nvn97ZOjZnmHorcEqbaYHuwRBQrGTnDb8SyiqDIjVNlFjnH9RQAYyMka2exNV1 vSvjM3uD8zNcXpyw2DaRSlZ5SyCabmgpgpGbrTYJjmcQNcJ/P8c6x2uV3EBVsi0c Bomf9iU0V7SRxcDjvBvU0Zw0fXTye22uhXRzrti5yrLNCvLucK3781tpz98FpVPc BG439GgiUIZCZdwwheqmXLIw+txcHiqO5iOmqhf+3fDpor9OZoME62b85BcDFVDD YPllchX460RAdsapATCh9G/ofdc+MLFuF2gDmnVXSzumIFx++s57DZQg7hdZWh2Z 1q9ySDjSP50= =n1Yw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1952115.3Hjl9r0vvn-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list