From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ip63c-0004Lj-Ts for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2007 17:48:17 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id lA5HkfNo021389; Mon, 5 Nov 2007 17:46:41 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lA5HhRt3016718 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2007 17:43:28 GMT Received: from gentoo.org (c-67-171-150-177.hsd1.or.comcast.net [67.171.150.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39291659A8 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2007 17:43:27 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 09:43:25 -0800 From: Donnie Berkholz To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sci-mathematics/mathomatic: ChangeLog mathomatic-12.7.9.ebuild Message-ID: <20071105174325.GC25343@supernova> References: <20071102065936.GZ30328@supernova> <200711051017.29474.cryos@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200711051017.29474.cryos@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-Archives-Salt: ee2eeb0b-09d1-4180-bd3a-90bd1f9fa016 X-Archives-Hash: f77a37d730f8e4b48c80afe5170182cf On 11:17 Mon 05 Nov , Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: > On Friday 02 November 2007 02:59:36 Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > Could you drop the icc USE flag? All you need to do is make sure this > > package respects CC, CFLAGS and LDFLAGS, and users can take care of the > > rest in make.conf. > > > I never put it in and just left it alone as I don't use ICC. I have dropped it > in the testing version but would rather leave the stable version alone. So if > nobody objects it will go from the tree once I stabilise this version. > > Is this policy that we are getting rid of icc stuff now? I think kugelfang > added it but didn't check to be honest. Just so I know when doing future > bumps. icc should be treated as a compiler, not as a USE flag. So if all you need to do is set up CC, CFLAGS, CXX and the like, just make sure the package respects the environment. If there's something else you need to do, such as set up a special config file for icc, you can do it based on tc-getCC() or tc-getCXX() rather than USE=icc. Thanks, Donnie -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list