From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1InJ3X-0003m7-U7 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:16:48 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with SMTP id l9VJFogx014121; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:15:50 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l9VJDrRl011705 for ; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:13:53 GMT Received: from gentoo.org (c-67-171-150-177.hsd1.or.comcast.net [67.171.150.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A5566541F for ; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:13:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 12:13:51 -0700 From: Donnie Berkholz To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-p2p/deluge: ChangeLog deluge-0.5.6.2.ebuild deluge-0.5.6.1.ebuild Message-ID: <20071031191351.GN30328@supernova> References: <20071031175801.GL30328@supernova> <4728C88C.1090406@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4728C88C.1090406@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-Archives-Salt: d14cd3c0-baf0-414e-a93b-0c28bb3b4fda X-Archives-Hash: 3a3ea115e32f9df327f7792ff65ced0b On 19:25 Wed 31 Oct , Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote: > Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > If you moved the filter-ldflags() call up to pkg_setup(), you could drop > > src_compile() altogether to clean up the ebuild a little. > > Wouldn't that make binary packages cry? Binary packages don't do any linking, so they don't pay any attention to LDFLAGS. Thanks, Donnie -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list