From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ImXjw-0006ct-78 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 16:45:24 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with SMTP id l9TGia1R003471; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 16:44:36 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l9TGfr0Y032239 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 16:41:54 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8B5464C85 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 16:41:52 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Slapd calls nss_ldap before opening its ports Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 12:41:51 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20071022121229.GA24735@bart.bs.l> <200710290847.29220.vapier@gentoo.org> <20071029125738.GA2938@bart.bs.l> In-Reply-To: <20071029125738.GA2938@bart.bs.l> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart38508035.2uihQkSeJS"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200710291241.52086.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: ddc5f433-755e-443c-8e77-374d84502e68 X-Archives-Hash: b9a06f1a605e3f67bf10b84d228bf41b --nextPart38508035.2uihQkSeJS Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 29 October 2007, Bertram Scharpf wrote: > Am Montag, 29. Okt 2007, 08:47:28 -0400 schrieb Mike Frysinger: > > while that sucks, it still does not make it appropriate for this list > > As I wrote in the first post the problem appeared when I > upgraded from glibc-2.5-r4 to glibc-2.6.1. At this point of > time I was not able to decide whether the problem was > Gentoo-specific or not. the context of "not appropriate" is not "this list" as in "Gentoo specific"= ,=20 but as in "this list is for development, not support" =2Dmike --nextPart38508035.2uihQkSeJS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARyYNT0FjO5/oN/WBAQJdoA/+O+I76Yhrkj9Hd16HUDB1hUVfw7czq0j1 MEndWj/Z5mvd82evPQd+h8E2oNDO8Mh8IX/ZUcO3eAnxUFbegkza0MHyfwFGmMnO 1VqyPs6KdeNz0+FYzOpsjjw+j4HXkHcbJEEIe9ZcGdD6f7eIkWEwv2SruZSD+XPJ jf9TKDveX4LFjDlZRp4HyqiPN/cgjY4Sg/MXdvA+zu36EK2kKo6Vz9b15FvXIr7s KsyOfuJZVENhT57tZqDSVwGlD0rZgPlg1/fPKKxORzn0Ay7xm2KyE7u2Cgm4jnnV A75JRzp3D4Lr3dqm0MbyAhNf/+PZPKCPC1I64+3/JbHqmdBsH6YSK8VO7PF8ZO8y sLTVxPpvy+Q5rQe9dZXupvKMkhU9dsJx/I/EnaA3C3dcoV7itDZql6SfwyHScnrW 1BQYlZdPpVjILVbPCjwdVrcy7BbRPmPB+JTubiNxpWkWGevVlK9usDmHXkCWtpkQ 6BTtWIMG6qht2aTxkiC2V9Y3H5Ue14M3YAC4WMVRcQ7tEgNFktjCR010Qg7IEuWl ZO5a0tU6rojsH/Gvnimn6dyUamcky7m7zph53ThPlPG2Xgb83uuTNZbAM/ZFRVeZ lMxlNncyUujB3Ua8xjNSmLc3WUAM+A7vcLXKu9K+272rnzFAydxekJAUF99E/n1l /6L8ilYhln0= =VvRP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart38508035.2uihQkSeJS-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list