From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IjokP-00043K-2y for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 04:18:37 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with SMTP id l9M46vaq021237; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 04:06:57 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l9M450XA018872 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 04:05:00 GMT Received: from gentoo.org (c-67-171-150-177.hsd1.or.comcast.net [67.171.150.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3C1564E9E for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 04:04:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 21:04:58 -0700 From: Donnie Berkholz To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new project gentoo-extreme-security Message-ID: <20071022040458.GF3883@supernova> References: <471BE402.1000704@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <471BE402.1000704@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-Archives-Salt: b854fb35-4bf0-495d-9c9c-7286a7d9b707 X-Archives-Hash: 5f285f3089cf62227f83c9058ebee38d On 01:42 Mon 22 Oct , Alexander Gabert wrote: > this is a request for comments on a new project: > > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/extreme-security/ > > When the webservers have finished mirroring the xml file, you can view the > description and the goals of the preliminary version of the new project > page for the Gentoo Extreme Security Project. The new project is about > sharing a new vision and building a development platform for new ideas and > collecting input about making Gentoo Linux even more attractive for > professional server environments and increasing the security and resilience > factor of the distribution beyond the currently possible achievements! I'm curious whether this would be better-placed as a subproject of either the security or hardened projects. Why do you think it would be better off independent? Thanks, Donnie -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list