From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IiHXL-0008MA-Uy for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:38:48 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with SMTP id l9HMRY0S026297; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:27:34 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l9HMPUIw023706 for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:25:32 GMT Received: from gentoo.org (c-67-171-150-177.hsd1.or.comcast.net [67.171.150.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 396F065046 for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:25:32 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:25:30 -0700 From: Donnie Berkholz To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: elibtoolize and when to drop it from an ebuild Message-ID: <20071017222530.GB5699@supernova> References: <1192632876.2388.18.camel@uberlaptop.development.ltl> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-Archives-Salt: 47e764f4-0cf3-41d6-b9e8-e7904e0984cd X-Archives-Hash: 418252c800b0fc8fb02e2a2af5bc76d4 On 19:51 Wed 17 Oct , Duncan wrote: > What about putting it in an fbsd conditional? That way Linux users don't > have to deal with the step if it's unnecessary for them, while the fbsd > users still get it when they need it. Seems to me this should be a > workable compromise, where people might otherwise be inclined to remove > it. I prefer to avoid conditionals wherever reasonable, because then you just have more code paths to test. Thanks, Donnie -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list