public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-dev]  jam -> ftjam
@ 2007-10-16  3:40 Ryan Hill
  2007-10-16  6:07 ` [gentoo-dev] " Christian Faulhammer
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ryan Hill @ 2007-10-16  3:40 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

i'd like to change the jam build-system implementation in Gentoo from
dev-util/jam to dev-util/ftjam.  ftjam is maintained by the freetype
project and is a drop in replacement for jam.  jam itself hasn't seen
much if any development upstream in quite some while and has some
issues with strict aliasing and GCC 4.2 so i'd like to drop it from
the tree.  both ebuilds install /usr/bin/jam so they block each other.

what's the best way to go about this?  a package move?  get ftjam
keyworded the same and change all the ebuilds that DEPEND on it at
once?  or change the ebuilds to do `|| (dev-util/ftjam dev-util/jam)`
first?

the ebuilds that this affects are:

/usr/portage/dev-games/cel/cel-0.98.2.ebuild
/usr/portage/dev-games/cel/cel-1.0.1.ebuild
/usr/portage/dev-games/crystalspace/crystalspace-0.98.4.ebuild
/usr/portage/dev-games/crystalspace/crystalspace-1.0.1.ebuild
/usr/portage/dev-games/crystalspace/crystalspace-1.2.ebuild
/usr/portage/games-engines/gargoyle/gargoyle-20060917-r1.ebuild
/usr/portage/games-simulation/lincity-ng/lincity-ng-1.1.0.ebuild
/usr/portage/games-simulation/lincity-ng/lincity-ng-1.1.1.ebuild
/usr/portage/games-sports/trigger/trigger-0.5.2.1.ebuild
/usr/portage/games-strategy/glest/glest-2.0.1.ebuild
/usr/portage/games-strategy/netpanzer/netpanzer-0.8.1.ebuild
/usr/portage/games-strategy/netpanzer/netpanzer-0.8.2.ebuild


-- 
                  fonts / wxWindows / gcc-porting / treecleaners
  EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD  C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 (0xF9A40662)

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* [gentoo-dev] Re: jam -> ftjam
  2007-10-16  3:40 [gentoo-dev] jam -> ftjam Ryan Hill
@ 2007-10-16  6:07 ` Christian Faulhammer
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Christian Faulhammer @ 2007-10-16  6:07 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 568 bytes --]

Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@gentoo.org>:

> what's the best way to go about this?  a package move?

 Don't think so, as it is not the same package in another category.

> get ftjam keyworded the same and change all the ebuilds that DEPEND
> on it at once?  or change the ebuilds to do `|| (dev-util/ftjam
> dev-util/jam)` first?

 The latter so people actually test it until you get all the KEYWORDS.

V-Li

-- 
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
<URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode

<URL:http://www.faulhammer.org/>

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-10-16  6:20 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-10-16  3:40 [gentoo-dev] jam -> ftjam Ryan Hill
2007-10-16  6:07 ` [gentoo-dev] " Christian Faulhammer

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox