From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IgCpy-0003C4-Lg for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 05:13:27 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with SMTP id l9C52hgf028310; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 05:02:43 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l9C50qpB025977 for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 05:00:53 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E355B64A2D for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 05:00:51 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -0.294 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.294 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xZMOKY2WPBON for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 05:00:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phaenix.haell.com (c-76-20-52-248.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.20.52.248]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ADA465636 for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 05:00:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by phaenix.haell.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0B21E26D463; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:00:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:00:38 -0700 From: Drake Wyrm To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] new category for texlive modular ebuilds? Message-ID: <20071012050038.GA14030@phaenix.haell.com> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <20071011195149.44c9f7de@toz.strangled.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071011195149.44c9f7de@toz.strangled.net> X-Fnord: There is no conspiracy X-Fortune: I'll be Grateful when they're Dead. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-Archives-Salt: 28eebddc-48c4-4252-9cab-c292c071dee1 X-Archives-Hash: 1baf22231ccaef9824db99e9b4097cb1 --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alexis Ballier wrote: > Hi,=20 >=20 > this might be worth discussion also (and make me even more late on my > schedule with merging texlive, but I knew I'd be) >=20 > In my overlay I was using a dev-texlive category for the texlive > modular texmf ebuilds > [as a side note : > dev-texlive $ ls | wc -l > 79 > ] >=20 > that was to avoid polluting dev-tex (which would be the current most > suitable category for those ebuilds), but well, both categories are fine > by me. What do you think about it ? I'd say not polluting it and put > them in a new category is better as it doesn't cost anything, but I > might have missed something. I would have expected app-text, the current home of the other TeX interpreters, to be more appropriate than dev-tex. Then again, with 79 new ebuilds, it might be prudent to open another category. If you did that, though, I'd suggest putting texlive and the other TeX interpreters in the same category. Perhaps app-tex would be good. Would that cause much confusion, being one letter off from an existing category? On the other hand (or is this back on the first hand?), 79 new packages wouldn't be much of a splash in the 231 existing packages of app-text. --=20 The only time I use xp is when I need to swap a pair of letters. --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkcO/3YACgkQQWVmeKdhp/LvtwCfSGPyBYubCQnw6P8FqQ4eZ7wB J3oAoJahcxnpx8SaxWShBo2hM35zPkyj =3N7Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list