Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-fs/ncdu: ChangeLog ncdu-1.3.ebuild

[Wolfram Schlich <wschlich@gentoo.org>]

* Robert Buchholz <rbu@gentoo.org> [2007-10-08 05:53]:
> On Thursday, 4. October 2007, Josh Sled wrote:
> > Wolfram Schlich <wschlich@gentoo.org> writes:
> > > * Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@gentoo.org> [2007-10-03 19:12]:
> > >> On 12:43 Wed 03 Oct     , Wolfram Schlich wrote:
> > >> > And *please*, don't send such mails to this
> > >> > list *and* to my address in addition.
> > >>
> > >> You can add a procmail rule to detect duplicates using a cache and
> > >> checking Message-Id, with formail. Examples of this are all over
> > >> the place. It's a useful rule to have for many reasons besides
> > >> this.
> > >
> > > Yeah, but it's unpredictable *which* one of the two mails makes
> > > it first onto my system, thus the one *not* sent to the list might
> >
> > Sigh.
> >
> > It is the same message, addressed To/Cc: you and/or the list, no
> > matter which one is delivered first.  So just put all list(+private)
> > filtering before personal filtering.
> 
> That doesn't work when filtering for List-Id headers which can be nicely 
> used with regex matching like so:
> [...]

Yup, I *only* filter mailing lists by list related headers like List-Id:
and others -- filtering list mails by To:/Cc:/Subject: headers is
broken by design.

My current gentoo-commits reply spamfilter looks like this:
--8<--
## Gentoo spam
:0
* ^From:.*@gentoo\.org
* ^Subject.*\[gentoo-commits\]
* ! ^List-Id:
/dev/null
--8<--
-- 
Regards,
Wolfram Schlich <wschlich@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Linux * http://dev.gentoo.org/~wschlich/
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list