From: "Tiziano Müller" <dev-zero@gentoo.org>
To: Doug Goldstein <cardoe@gentoo.org>
Cc: Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-fs/evms: ChangeLog evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:13:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200710111113.13732.dev-zero@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <470B7A78.3090805@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1980 bytes --]
Am Dienstag, 9. Oktober 2007 14.56:24 schrieb Doug Goldstein:
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > On 22:01 Mon 08 Oct , Doug Goldstein (cardoe) wrote:
> >> 1.1 sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild
> >>
> >> file :
> >> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r
> >>8.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup plain:
> >> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r
> >>8.ebuild?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain
> >>
> >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/md_super_fix.patch"
> >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/ntfs_unmkfs.patch"
> >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_degrade_fix_v2.patch"
> >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_remove_spare_fix.patch"
> >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_remove_spare_fix_2.patch"
> >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_algorithm.patch"
> >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/cli_reload_options.patch"
> >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/cli_query_segfault.patch"
> >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/get_geometry.patch"
> >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/BaseName.patch"
> >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/disk_cache.patch"
> >>
> >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-as-needed.patch"
> >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-glib_dep.patch"
> >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-ocfs2.patch"
> >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-use_disk_group.patch"
> >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-pagesize.patch"
> >
> > This would be another good candidate for using epatch's bulk patching,
> > particularly if you moved the last group of patches into the PV
> > directory.
>
> dev-zero?
Nope. The stuff in ${PV} are the patches upstream has on their servers, while
the others are mostly Gentoo-specific or something else. So I want them to be
separated.
And I don't see any reason to start renaming now.
Cheers,
Tiziano
--
Tiziano Müller
Gentoo Linux Developer
Areas of responsibility: Samba, PostgreSQL, cpp, Python
E-Mail : dev-zero@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : F327 283A E769 2E36 18D5 4DE2 1B05 6A63 AE9C 1E30
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-11 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <E1If0f8-00081l-81@stork.gentoo.org>
2007-10-09 4:21 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-fs/evms: ChangeLog evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild Donnie Berkholz
2007-10-09 12:56 ` Doug Goldstein
2007-10-11 9:13 ` Tiziano Müller [this message]
2007-10-11 9:48 ` Donnie Berkholz
2007-10-11 16:19 ` Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200710111113.13732.dev-zero@gentoo.org \
--to=dev-zero@gentoo.org \
--cc=cardoe@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox