From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ifuqn-0003lR-LU for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 10:01:06 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with SMTP id l9B9oPHn028278; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:50:25 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l9B9mUmu025827 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:48:30 GMT Received: from gentoo.org (c-67-171-150-177.hsd1.or.comcast.net [67.171.150.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72A9F656AE; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:48:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 02:48:27 -0700 From: Donnie Berkholz To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: Doug Goldstein Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-fs/evms: ChangeLog evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild Message-ID: <20071011094827.GB4289@supernova> References: <20071009042145.GC31103@supernova> <470B7A78.3090805@gentoo.org> <200710111113.13732.dev-zero@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200710111113.13732.dev-zero@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id l9B9oPJV028278 X-Archives-Salt: ee5a6587-aa50-4c30-bc6d-638a700f4d70 X-Archives-Hash: 4236434761e24004deb4e159eadd150a On 11:13 Thu 11 Oct , Tiziano M=FCller wrote: > Am Dienstag, 9. Oktober 2007 14.56:24 schrieb Doug Goldstein: > > Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > > On 22:01 Mon 08 Oct , Doug Goldstein (cardoe) wrote: > > >> 1.1 sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild > > >> > > >> file : > > >> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/evms/evms-2= .5.5-r > > >>8.ebuild?rev=3D1.1&view=3Dmarkup plain: > > >> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/evms/evms-2= .5.5-r > > >>8.ebuild?rev=3D1.1&content-type=3Dtext/plain > > >> > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/md_super_fix.patch" > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/ntfs_unmkfs.patch" > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_degrade_fix_v2.patch" > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_remove_spare_fix.patch" > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_remove_spare_fix_2.patch" > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_algorithm.patch" > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/cli_reload_options.patch" > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/cli_query_segfault.patch" > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/get_geometry.patch" > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/BaseName.patch" > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/disk_cache.patch" > > >> > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-as-needed.patch" > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-glib_dep.patch" > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-ocfs2.patch" > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-use_disk_group.patch" > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-pagesize.patch" > > > > > > This would be another good candidate for using epatch's bulk patchi= ng, > > > particularly if you moved the last group of patches into the PV > > > directory. > > > > dev-zero? > Nope. The stuff in ${PV} are the patches upstream has on their servers,= while=20 > the others are mostly Gentoo-specific or something else. So I want them= to be=20 > separated. > And I don't see any reason to start renaming now. Oh, I would've expected upstream patches to be in SRC_URI ... Thanks, Donnie --=20 gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list