public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: Doug Goldstein <cardoe@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-fs/evms: ChangeLog evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 02:48:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071011094827.GB4289@supernova> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200710111113.13732.dev-zero@gentoo.org>

On 11:13 Thu 11 Oct     , Tiziano Müller wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 9. Oktober 2007 14.56:24 schrieb Doug Goldstein:
> > Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > > On 22:01 Mon 08 Oct     , Doug Goldstein (cardoe) wrote:
> > >> 1.1                  sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild
> > >>
> > >> file :
> > >> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r
> > >>8.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup plain:
> > >> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r
> > >>8.ebuild?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain
> > >>
> > >> 	epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/md_super_fix.patch"
> > >> 	epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/ntfs_unmkfs.patch"
> > >> 	epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_degrade_fix_v2.patch"
> > >> 	epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_remove_spare_fix.patch"
> > >> 	epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_remove_spare_fix_2.patch"
> > >> 	epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_algorithm.patch"
> > >> 	epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/cli_reload_options.patch"
> > >> 	epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/cli_query_segfault.patch"
> > >> 	epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/get_geometry.patch"
> > >> 	epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/BaseName.patch"
> > >> 	epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/disk_cache.patch"
> > >>
> > >> 	epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-as-needed.patch"
> > >> 	epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-glib_dep.patch"
> > >> 	epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-ocfs2.patch"
> > >> 	epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-use_disk_group.patch"
> > >> 	epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-pagesize.patch"
> > >
> > > This would be another good candidate for using epatch's bulk patching,
> > > particularly if you moved the last group of patches into the PV
> > > directory.
> >
> > dev-zero?
> Nope. The stuff in ${PV} are the patches upstream has on their servers, while 
> the others are mostly Gentoo-specific or something else. So I want them to be 
> separated.
> And I don't see any reason to start renaming now.

Oh, I would've expected upstream patches to be in SRC_URI ...

Thanks,
Donnie
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-11 10:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <E1If0f8-00081l-81@stork.gentoo.org>
2007-10-09  4:21 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-fs/evms: ChangeLog evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild Donnie Berkholz
2007-10-09 12:56   ` Doug Goldstein
2007-10-11  9:13     ` Tiziano Müller
2007-10-11  9:48       ` Donnie Berkholz [this message]
2007-10-11 16:19       ` Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071011094827.GB4289@supernova \
    --to=dberkholz@gentoo.org \
    --cc=cardoe@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox