* [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-fs/evms: ChangeLog evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild
[not found] <E1If0f8-00081l-81@stork.gentoo.org>
@ 2007-10-09 4:21 ` Donnie Berkholz
2007-10-09 12:56 ` Doug Goldstein
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Donnie Berkholz @ 2007-10-09 4:21 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev, cardoe
On 22:01 Mon 08 Oct , Doug Goldstein (cardoe) wrote:
> 1.1 sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild
>
> file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup
> plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain
> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/md_super_fix.patch"
> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/ntfs_unmkfs.patch"
> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_degrade_fix_v2.patch"
> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_remove_spare_fix.patch"
> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_remove_spare_fix_2.patch"
> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_algorithm.patch"
> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/cli_reload_options.patch"
> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/cli_query_segfault.patch"
> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/get_geometry.patch"
> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/BaseName.patch"
> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/disk_cache.patch"
>
> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-as-needed.patch"
> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-glib_dep.patch"
> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-ocfs2.patch"
> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-use_disk_group.patch"
> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-pagesize.patch"
This would be another good candidate for using epatch's bulk patching,
particularly if you moved the last group of patches into the PV
directory.
> mv -f ${D}/$(get_libdir)/*.a "${D}/usr/$(get_libdir)"
> mv -f ${D}/sbin/evmsgui ${D}/usr/sbin
Quoting
Thanks,
Donnie
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-fs/evms: ChangeLog evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild
2007-10-09 4:21 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-fs/evms: ChangeLog evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild Donnie Berkholz
@ 2007-10-09 12:56 ` Doug Goldstein
2007-10-11 9:13 ` Tiziano Müller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Doug Goldstein @ 2007-10-09 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Gentoo Dev, dev-zero
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 22:01 Mon 08 Oct , Doug Goldstein (cardoe) wrote:
>> 1.1 sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild
>>
>> file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup
>> plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain
>
>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/md_super_fix.patch"
>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/ntfs_unmkfs.patch"
>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_degrade_fix_v2.patch"
>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_remove_spare_fix.patch"
>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_remove_spare_fix_2.patch"
>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_algorithm.patch"
>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/cli_reload_options.patch"
>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/cli_query_segfault.patch"
>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/get_geometry.patch"
>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/BaseName.patch"
>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/disk_cache.patch"
>>
>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-as-needed.patch"
>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-glib_dep.patch"
>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-ocfs2.patch"
>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-use_disk_group.patch"
>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-pagesize.patch"
>
> This would be another good candidate for using epatch's bulk patching,
> particularly if you moved the last group of patches into the PV
> directory.
dev-zero?
I merely fixed baselayout-2 issues and didn't change any functionality
of the ebuild since I don't have an evms setup to test.
>
>> mv -f ${D}/$(get_libdir)/*.a "${D}/usr/$(get_libdir)"
>> mv -f ${D}/sbin/evmsgui ${D}/usr/sbin
>
> Quoting
>
> Thanks,
> Donnie
Your a bit late. I fixed the quoting issues in the ebuild around 8pm EDT
along with a few other issues. See the -r9 ebuild.
--
Doug Goldstein <cardoe@gentoo.org>
http://dev.gentoo.org/~cardoe/
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-fs/evms: ChangeLog evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild
2007-10-09 12:56 ` Doug Goldstein
@ 2007-10-11 9:13 ` Tiziano Müller
2007-10-11 9:48 ` Donnie Berkholz
2007-10-11 16:19 ` Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tiziano Müller @ 2007-10-11 9:13 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Doug Goldstein; +Cc: Gentoo Dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1980 bytes --]
Am Dienstag, 9. Oktober 2007 14.56:24 schrieb Doug Goldstein:
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > On 22:01 Mon 08 Oct , Doug Goldstein (cardoe) wrote:
> >> 1.1 sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild
> >>
> >> file :
> >> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r
> >>8.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup plain:
> >> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r
> >>8.ebuild?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain
> >>
> >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/md_super_fix.patch"
> >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/ntfs_unmkfs.patch"
> >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_degrade_fix_v2.patch"
> >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_remove_spare_fix.patch"
> >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_remove_spare_fix_2.patch"
> >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_algorithm.patch"
> >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/cli_reload_options.patch"
> >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/cli_query_segfault.patch"
> >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/get_geometry.patch"
> >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/BaseName.patch"
> >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/disk_cache.patch"
> >>
> >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-as-needed.patch"
> >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-glib_dep.patch"
> >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-ocfs2.patch"
> >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-use_disk_group.patch"
> >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-pagesize.patch"
> >
> > This would be another good candidate for using epatch's bulk patching,
> > particularly if you moved the last group of patches into the PV
> > directory.
>
> dev-zero?
Nope. The stuff in ${PV} are the patches upstream has on their servers, while
the others are mostly Gentoo-specific or something else. So I want them to be
separated.
And I don't see any reason to start renaming now.
Cheers,
Tiziano
--
Tiziano Müller
Gentoo Linux Developer
Areas of responsibility: Samba, PostgreSQL, cpp, Python
E-Mail : dev-zero@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : F327 283A E769 2E36 18D5 4DE2 1B05 6A63 AE9C 1E30
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-fs/evms: ChangeLog evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild
2007-10-11 9:13 ` Tiziano Müller
@ 2007-10-11 9:48 ` Donnie Berkholz
2007-10-11 16:19 ` Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Donnie Berkholz @ 2007-10-11 9:48 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev; +Cc: Doug Goldstein
On 11:13 Thu 11 Oct , Tiziano Müller wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 9. Oktober 2007 14.56:24 schrieb Doug Goldstein:
> > Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > > On 22:01 Mon 08 Oct , Doug Goldstein (cardoe) wrote:
> > >> 1.1 sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild
> > >>
> > >> file :
> > >> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r
> > >>8.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup plain:
> > >> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r
> > >>8.ebuild?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain
> > >>
> > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/md_super_fix.patch"
> > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/ntfs_unmkfs.patch"
> > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_degrade_fix_v2.patch"
> > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_remove_spare_fix.patch"
> > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_remove_spare_fix_2.patch"
> > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_algorithm.patch"
> > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/cli_reload_options.patch"
> > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/cli_query_segfault.patch"
> > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/get_geometry.patch"
> > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/BaseName.patch"
> > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/disk_cache.patch"
> > >>
> > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-as-needed.patch"
> > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-glib_dep.patch"
> > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-ocfs2.patch"
> > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-use_disk_group.patch"
> > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-pagesize.patch"
> > >
> > > This would be another good candidate for using epatch's bulk patching,
> > > particularly if you moved the last group of patches into the PV
> > > directory.
> >
> > dev-zero?
> Nope. The stuff in ${PV} are the patches upstream has on their servers, while
> the others are mostly Gentoo-specific or something else. So I want them to be
> separated.
> And I don't see any reason to start renaming now.
Oh, I would've expected upstream patches to be in SRC_URI ...
Thanks,
Donnie
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-fs/evms: ChangeLog evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild
2007-10-11 9:13 ` Tiziano Müller
2007-10-11 9:48 ` Donnie Berkholz
@ 2007-10-11 16:19 ` Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- @ 2007-10-11 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Gentoo Dev; +Cc: Doug Goldstein
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=utf-8; format=flowed, Size: 1983 bytes --]
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Tiziano Müller wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 9. Oktober 2007 14.56:24 schrieb Doug Goldstein:
>> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>>> On 22:01 Mon 08 Oct , Doug Goldstein (cardoe) wrote:
>>>> 1.1 sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild
>>>>
>>>> file :
>>>> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r
>>>> 8.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup plain:
>>>> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r
>>>> 8.ebuild?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain
>>>>
>>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/md_super_fix.patch"
>>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/ntfs_unmkfs.patch"
>>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_degrade_fix_v2.patch"
>>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_remove_spare_fix.patch"
>>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_remove_spare_fix_2.patch"
>>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_algorithm.patch"
>>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/cli_reload_options.patch"
>>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/cli_query_segfault.patch"
>>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/get_geometry.patch"
>>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/BaseName.patch"
>>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/disk_cache.patch"
>>>>
>>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-as-needed.patch"
>>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-glib_dep.patch"
>>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-ocfs2.patch"
>>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-use_disk_group.patch"
>>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-pagesize.patch"
>>>
>>> This would be another good candidate for using epatch's bulk patching,
>>> particularly if you moved the last group of patches into the PV
>>> directory.
>>
>> dev-zero?
> Nope. The stuff in ${PV} are the patches upstream has on their servers, while
> the others are mostly Gentoo-specific or something else. So I want them to be
> separated.
> And I don't see any reason to start renaming now.
Still no good reason not to just call epatch once:
epatch \
list \
of \
patches \
here
Michael Sterrett
-Mr. Bones.-
mr_bones_@gentoo.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-10-11 16:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <E1If0f8-00081l-81@stork.gentoo.org>
2007-10-09 4:21 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-fs/evms: ChangeLog evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild Donnie Berkholz
2007-10-09 12:56 ` Doug Goldstein
2007-10-11 9:13 ` Tiziano Müller
2007-10-11 9:48 ` Donnie Berkholz
2007-10-11 16:19 ` Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox