From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IehnI-0002zZ-06 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2007 01:52:28 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with SMTP id l981g6oD001570; Mon, 8 Oct 2007 01:42:06 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l981eFwg031625 for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2007 01:40:15 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AF1A65320 for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2007 01:40:14 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] new-style virtual/editor Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 21:40:12 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20071005204242.641b8727@gentoo.org> <20071005202715.3dcff9cf@maya> <1191611891.13943.53.camel@TesterTop3.tester.ca> In-Reply-To: <1191611891.13943.53.camel@TesterTop3.tester.ca> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1266949.oSXCu6KQPR"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200710072140.13142.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: a731a672-58e4-4f6f-8bc8-7223b31349fb X-Archives-Hash: 9edf64a17c7cc24c3965c4744b17b9e8 --nextPart1266949.oSXCu6KQPR Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 05 October 2007, Olivier Cr=EAte wrote: > On Fri, 2007-05-10 at 20:27 +0100, Stephen Bennett wrote: > > Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > > How many packages depend on virtual/editor? Should it be a virtual at > > > all? > > > > The system set depends on it, and last I knew didn't allow for any-of > > deps. > > Does it really depend on it ? Or is it just a convenient dep so its > installed as part of the stage1 ? Why not just put nano in the system > (which is was gets pulled into the stages anyway). if it's part of the "system" target, then it's a pita for people to switch= =20 editors ... `emerge vim && emerge -C nano` wont work anymore if it's part of the "build" target (meaning it goes into stage1 but isnt pa= rt=20 of "system"), then it'll get cleaned by default when doing something simple= =20 like `emerge depclean` it doesnt matter to me whether ebuilds do PROVIDE or a new style virtual,=20 whatever floats your boat i guess =2Dmike --nextPart1266949.oSXCu6KQPR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARwmKfUFjO5/oN/WBAQJlXRAAoWlAa767gYR+72jbxAtexfVgFlhlf7CQ U+jMhyzHO4qHHkrJoUpLEkJkNOFcsIFzrLg+9XSm2RVGiFXpPTlhMCfJvMYAQVVz QrpmbBcT12WScKvktC1cD5r5WfN0gOOLqwlnN9XO6/gC6EOzOD5sEtqi/zcsx4C3 WXpgDQaDZuCIA9nn0BSV5BqvBIIB4NOMai5OCk9N7mRS3XUb6Ym7PGd4UYzwHeYO e/nUyDxUzB4ptCzlLpFDWbzRIcGlsjG1FWbIs1rHmkdkMa3pcvJEoPwAx2JSWgNk 318x6+5/FGMcuqBXw/Zl2H35r6lNP04RroBb+BsjUafsOUhZQc77/9SO79hdas3y zaSEpVyccxvTEEa0NbEKaQZO07G7C4HbqMN+xPJOtYKObF0LmW2TEEz+uymyqCFa D7XEc33/NXV4TuB+Z0cyLML6FnTeL5WRNOFSJpN+U5E9baycdSdD6a2ZyzCFDGTd ieSu8VAvfnyoB52A96fmwr4VhwEl8gu9vPBVBVr+ZQTiSmpopCxFKssnCfwU2cnn dcqxCF3BRuoYvgYYkceEmHOjGWKMGAxxTRwMgQpxHQSK3V/MySKWuZJO4kuTDDNn N7xwipYsyDDXbMuauTNf1CUPOChJOT7nghqh68c+H2qvfl6+Vz/N8orfa+nXQnxK Zmb/YJIDFa4= =MciQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1266949.oSXCu6KQPR-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list