From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IebdG-0004CX-Vy for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 07 Oct 2007 19:17:43 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with SMTP id l97J7Ndx002600; Sun, 7 Oct 2007 19:07:23 GMT Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l97J5YMi032762 for ; Sun, 7 Oct 2007 19:05:34 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost-12225.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 261CD16EEFC; Sun, 7 Oct 2007 21:05:31 +0200 (MEST) Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 12224) with ESMTP id 23497-04; Sun, 7 Oct 2007 21:05:23 +0200 (MEST) 12654 Received: from joel.lan (i59F7233F.versanet.de [89.247.35.63]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: buchholz) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sun, 7 Oct 2007 21:05:23 +0200 (MEST) From: Robert Buchholz To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] new-style virtual/editor Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 21:05:16 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 Cc: "Alec Warner" , "Olivier =?iso-8859-1?q?Cr=EAte?=" References: <20071005204242.641b8727@gentoo.org> <200710071211.31805.rbu@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2075557.nKUmQp4ddh"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200710072105.16446.rbu@gentoo.org> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de (including spamassassin) X-Archives-Salt: 5718fde7-c36a-4a72-a6d1-0ca1a351b2c7 X-Archives-Hash: 12462873f05b74a17628a27fc4756c59 --nextPart2075557.nKUmQp4ddh Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday, 7. October 2007, Alec Warner wrote: > On 10/7/07, Robert Buchholz wrote: > > On Friday, 5. October 2007, Olivier Cr=EAte wrote: > > > On Fri, 2007-05-10 at 11:46 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > > > How many packages depend on virtual/editor? Should it be a > > > > virtual at all? > > > > > > !rdep virtual/editor > > > virtual/editor <- app-admin/sudo sys-process/fcron > > > > > > I think the answer is none that really should, I would favor just > > > removing virtual/editor. > > > > A lot more applications need it, see subversion and cvs, which > > invoke $EDITOR. > > I think you missed the train when someone mentioned we put an editor > in system, thus making one always available. I thought this discussion was going into a direction that had the system=20 dependency removed. I guess I was mistaking. Robert --nextPart2075557.nKUmQp4ddh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBHCS3syZx3L/ph1soRAud6AJ44CD/ujo4PZMmfAd7q591KhDJnIwCgk8pE b6vupfjWQdPHmcy0waNXI5k= =TpKD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2075557.nKUmQp4ddh-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list