From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Idshr-0002fa-MJ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2007 19:19:28 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with SMTP id l95J9Km0000992; Fri, 5 Oct 2007 19:09:20 GMT Received: from pan.object4.net (pan.object4.net [80.82.141.134]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l95J7QMb031067 for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2007 19:07:26 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pan.object4.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDB6B68170 for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2007 20:07:26 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at pan.object4.net X-Spam-Score: 0.405 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.405 tagged_above=-100 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.958, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=2.046] Received: from pan.object4.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pan.object4.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9B9pp+JDSrdx for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2007 20:07:24 +0100 (BST) Received: from maya (cpc4-cmbg1-0-0-cust196.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [82.21.108.197]) by pan.object4.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A1D66816F for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2007 20:07:24 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 20:27:15 +0100 From: Stephen Bennett To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] new-style virtual/editor Message-ID: <20071005202715.3dcff9cf@maya> In-Reply-To: <20071005184629.GN29572@supernova> References: <20071005204242.641b8727@gentoo.org> <20071005184629.GN29572@supernova> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.7.2 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 263e2fa6-afd2-4b57-81ad-2e73b3394d34 X-Archives-Hash: 115395cc447892e5b08dbfa1a8069542 On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 11:46:29 -0700 Donnie Berkholz wrote: > How many packages depend on virtual/editor? Should it be a virtual at > all? The system set depends on it, and last I knew didn't allow for any-of deps. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list