From: Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Getting rid of lurking no* USE flags - profile-based package.use
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 10:06:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071003170610.GU15143@supernova> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4703C557.4000005@gentoo.org>
On 09:37 Wed 03 Oct , Zac Medico wrote:
> Trying to include things that aren't implemented or things that are
> controversial will delay it. It's difficult to make time estimates
> for anything that's not implemented yet.
>
> It's trivial to do the EAPI-1 bump if we only include things that
> are already implemented. I can have a sys-apps/portage release in
> the tree this week with EAPI-1 support if we choose to do that.
> Looking at bug #174380, I'd say that EAPI-1 should certainly include
> #174405, #174410, and #179380 since they're all implemented and
> relatively non-controversial. Anything more than those can lead to
> potential delays.
Alright, do it! =) "Release early, release often" applies to EAPI too.
Thanks,
Donnie
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-03 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-02 9:33 [gentoo-dev] Getting rid of lurking no* USE flags - profile-based package.use Robin H. Johnson
2007-10-02 13:44 ` Jason Smathers
2007-10-02 22:29 ` Zac Medico
2007-10-03 0:47 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill
2007-10-03 6:26 ` Rémi Cardona
2007-10-03 16:37 ` Zac Medico
2007-10-03 17:06 ` Donnie Berkholz [this message]
2007-10-03 18:10 ` Ryan Hill
2007-10-09 13:04 ` [gentoo-dev] " Jim Ramsay
2007-10-10 1:44 ` Zac Medico
2007-10-10 8:16 ` Denis Dupeyron
2007-10-10 8:54 ` Zac Medico
2007-10-10 9:02 ` Marius Mauch
2007-10-10 17:29 ` Zac Medico
2007-10-10 18:27 ` Denis Dupeyron
2007-10-10 19:31 ` Zac Medico
2007-10-12 6:17 ` [gentoo-dev] " Steve Long
2007-10-12 6:53 ` Zac Medico
2007-10-14 8:45 ` [gentoo-dev] " Steve Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071003170610.GU15143@supernova \
--to=dberkholz@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox