From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Icfk5-0001ya-Gg for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 11:16:45 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with SMTP id l92B6M8j022206; Tue, 2 Oct 2007 11:06:22 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l92B1Wb1014850 for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2007 11:01:33 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F24276531F for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2007 11:01:31 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: sh versionator.eclass Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 07:00:59 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200710012259.40589.uberlord@gentoo.org> <200710020628.47971.vapier@gentoo.org> <1191322161.6284.70.camel@uberlaptop.marples.name> In-Reply-To: <1191322161.6284.70.camel@uberlaptop.marples.name> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3007362.gxV0aWWojm"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200710020700.59958.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 749dbcd0-b511-4a36-afdc-3641e3b6d2c9 X-Archives-Hash: 0d233bca02fd796062e0b632fa067d17 --nextPart3007362.gxV0aWWojm Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 02 October 2007, Roy Marples wrote: > On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 06:28 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > project X says their code should be compiled with GCC, should we deny > > > the ICC users the ability to compile it? > > > > that is project X's decision and no one else's. dont pull a stallman on > > us and force everyone to subscribe to your ideas of "freedom". there's= a > > reason we told him to take a hike. > > We change upstream decisions all the time via patches and USE flags when > we as developers think that it could be done better, to make it fit into > our file layout. some people (because it's in *their* interest to do so) have the option of= =20 maintaining changes. that does not mean anyone is required to do so. glib= c=20 for example provides no support unless you build it with gcc. so how does= =20 icc build it ? they implement the *useful* GNU extensions. =2Dmike --nextPart3007362.gxV0aWWojm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARwIk60FjO5/oN/WBAQKChxAA22PyrvErvtvmXi3KV0Pyyk2HKR4j4cwc G5I2x+w4VSx9tFWtd8jOEocoSMSqK415kN7bZmtebuTMgMUZJZOtWB/lFhAyJC3Q qg4bGUbHPYzxtumP7weiSJMi74xTZ5AInT+10UxpaJGseGxdroQRnZdEbelms+ke R7Od2GCRql4M5F0UzljS+WmikklsaAAo6K6RgE0PYHltC1H4REfD7kPHwuyr9w1B U5ee08OZjI3qAaC+Zrp8GIeGSt6urCEdpYLzTohzdorxqMZFfcmqlf8OwLgnXHMJ imreaQb7Eexuye0cfBVoFmTsOOpdG3SsvS1I+nua9QoRRHCZp228SGhHgk8ZrEJw mQPTigOETJtyDLueJrAy+yhHtSVMSNz6WFWmrKBlUN8NUuIihFMPlVWDrzXxbm69 18iyR8qds0MVBsVnZSB9i9MDXJoubDaBw2MF4HcV2p77qErRajyxxsb+SsUrRg2h ZZFtV7m/6yg7dSfW0RaTgXbP9b3Z5PEPFTfSbF9/r+sy3zaegq81L1qiGs2buRkS kqhSShNUw6XQWQuIDFWY2PtCpAZmxeT0ATK/NwsAQD9S2X5jUHaMHZMQcH72JBYU CWVIHgQ0Ulr2yTfHJxi3DPTZJAaWZvkON4pDDCNXWDglPTrzLFeaR2JGByt2L5SY +WIbuaLGLNY= =Zpgn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3007362.gxV0aWWojm-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list