From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Icf3N-0000L0-Bc for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 10:32:37 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with SMTP id l92AKjbo003617; Tue, 2 Oct 2007 10:20:45 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l92AHIWv030761 for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2007 10:17:18 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA7F965047 for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2007 10:17:17 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for October Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 06:17:16 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <47016C7B.8090807@gentoo.org> <4701A82D.9020201@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4385401.puyqeXdssF"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200710020617.17275.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 00a1e043-7db6-4e68-a003-31a23136649b X-Archives-Hash: 79a187332f7ab37c3f31dd4751f7d65e --nextPart4385401.puyqeXdssF Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 02 October 2007, Steve Long wrote: > Agreed, as it leaves Gentoo without a Council for a month, and you could > end up with no consistency at all viz date of elections. Stating that the > officials must be selected before the nomination process can be started, > and that the same deadline applies (one month of nominations, one of > voting) seems like good planning. Might as well get the whole process > sorted with one vote and move on. this was all cleared up the last meeting > I also concur with whoever said Council meeting notifications should be > discussed on project (maybe a reply-to project for the notification if it > needs to go to dev to ensure everyone sees it) since the discussion is > rarely about technical stuff, despite that being most of the work which t= he > Council does. Even for technical matters, the discussions i have seen at > least on dev about Council decisions, have always been contentious and > veered off into non-technical aspects (which is probably why they're on t= he > Council agenda in the first place.) no. the point of the notice was that so people who were trying to get=20 technical standards passed did not forget about the timeline of doing so. = =20 i'll see about duplicating the notice to -project though. =2Dmike --nextPart4385401.puyqeXdssF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARwIarUFjO5/oN/WBAQI+WhAAjDHn9WphNucLa9oQ7q/U4ldUkrEPPRGh ARAKNEILR4w8/dqIV1yy8qZOTh0CPusysZSfan5e/usITkZQmGicvujfupMNAds/ YaqHtszo8EXWdfcv2/FJ7y3IRUNg0z1R6sWTB7mHzk2NQy2Q2TqJS0Py+4Xi+/bp sreVa6uXrg1x4Db6GTLhuCOn9qxMIOA9IwFiFpOYwErQKGB5Q+T2m/eol39RxsKh tmuM3t7oLByVxC2qZO8HhVvelJEpQUO+E9ykYFMhityPlyiS/pQ6ZzlwraAh0+QK 90g2MPaM7WHXlyZaAL6sz6L7PrJolC0kB63JpYxfxBaYc5BlwkJt5n5pcwXSxsg0 /XVU5LI39ifeG/UYjpzl8mZlizjd1c1DFyginq5aTvdNogqkB5sM2GCA20DSyWIS FQXQGGf3I/hKilOADsr03ofQSB8RR35CczjACfnuiLoodLV6P3pGr3RniPKaBQKh Npglqu4VS8plF8HmideilVZ66KPyXQBVDv98mEKB1gFA/pT7+68YdHxUNCUKZyaz Mrnoxqm+9GxoedNeeqWOPXMhM0Hpri7hLysJDKUElSgsH1q1nCJmFV8r5Bf5gWQC YpVVNZm4ElebXNaAooO7+18ErkIqjkXN3DzZcYM8O3ZSFByPWJhgWYzjZsarBBzR PDLzKdq3//Q= =Hn+K -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4385401.puyqeXdssF-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list