From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IcUGf-000773-0b for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 23:01:37 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with SMTP id l91Mplg6006284; Mon, 1 Oct 2007 22:51:47 GMT Received: from mail.marples.name (rsm.demon.co.uk [80.177.111.50]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l91MmuFs002269 for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2007 22:48:56 GMT Received: from uberlaptop.marples.name (uberlaptop.marples.name [10.73.1.31]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.marples.name (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25F68190038 for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2007 23:48:56 +0100 (BST) From: Roy Marples To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: sh versionator.eclass Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 23:48:55 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200710012259.40589.uberlord@gentoo.org> <200710012330.16778.uberlord@gentoo.org> <20071001224136.GA9048@ferdyx.org> In-Reply-To: <20071001224136.GA9048@ferdyx.org> Organization: Gentoo Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200710012348.55548.uberlord@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 173b2ed5-3899-4b02-b54e-ed0e745c1cb3 X-Archives-Hash: a5ee7079ce4252ae2c57cf6965750573 On Monday 01 October 2007 23:41:36 Fernando J. Pereda wrote: > I sure as hell am not going to proof read all that (mainly because I > think not using bash features in an environment where bash is required > is silly, instead of being an improvement) OK. Maybe I shouldn't have mentioned the "in sh" bit. If I re-submit stuff and just claim better readability and less code you'll read it then? > but I find interesting that > you ripped Ciaran's copyright while leaving the "Prod ciaranm if you > find something it can't handle" comment. I copied and pasted the comments for the most part. Sorry for leaving that bit in. And I thought that the Gentoo Foundation had the copyright? Thanks Roy -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list