From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IZuhX-0005ap-PH for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:38:44 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with SMTP id l8OKSfKD014177; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:28:41 GMT Received: from mo-p07-ob.rzone.de (mo-p07-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.189]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l8OKOa0f007203 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:24:36 GMT Received: from localhost (dynamic-unidsl-85-197-20-242.westend.de [85.197.20.242]) by post.webmailer.de (klopstock mo17) (RZmta 12.10) with ESMTP id w00c34j8OJojaP for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 22:24:35 +0200 (MEST) (envelope-from: ) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 22:24:35 +0200 From: Christian Faulhammer To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-office/magicpoint: ChangeLog magicpoint-1.12a.ebuild Message-ID: <20070924222435.3f6641b4@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200709241618.09366.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <20070924194426.GN22279@supernova> <20070924220358.01cd66c8@gentoo.org> <200709241618.09366.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.1 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_lSPbaXsTMxpenCs+KElycW6; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-RZG-AUTH: hXn+rC1arvT7Lf9I/zKDqjrgIkrokD1Qxy5bIqfbp9I10BMNL35Kumb7+O8gwT7k0TedKMh0 X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo07 X-Archives-Salt: 416b1672-dab1-48da-a624-369d26a82031 X-Archives-Hash: ac370c4cb71965d480a2b56bd771ed3c --Sig_lSPbaXsTMxpenCs+KElycW6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mike Frysinger : > > Because it fails, magicpoint's build system is really old and > > weird. The comment above should state that, but the leftover -j1 I > > tried would confuse the reader. Plus the stupid die comments. > most people associate "emake" with "run in parallel" when in reality, > that is merely one of the things it provides > if something doesnt work in parallel, you use `emake -j1` ... using > `make` generally doesnt make sense anywhere I know the difference, but thanks. That comment has been added because I tried it with emake -j1...it still failed, so I chose to use make. And then forgot to remove the comment. V-Li --=20 Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project , #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode --Sig_lSPbaXsTMxpenCs+KElycW6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFG+B0DNQqtfCuFneMRAqZpAJ95EfY3X7gwt2R7w4xDPFPcGxpG7QCcDJ1Q s3OI/dUtGoy1sbq2l5OyqKs= =HW8S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_lSPbaXsTMxpenCs+KElycW6-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list