From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IUTaT-0006LQ-Ci for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 09 Sep 2007 20:40:57 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l89KXAMX028374; Sun, 9 Sep 2007 20:33:10 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l89KVIcG026131 for ; Sun, 9 Sep 2007 20:31:18 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 145C96515C for ; Sun, 9 Sep 2007 20:31:16 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass: cmake-utils.eclass Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 16:32:58 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200709092115.17423.philantrop@gentoo.org> <200709092148.15201.peper@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200709092148.15201.peper@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart10013186.eONJSIJfOP"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200709091632.59350.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 3422c65c-e7ad-445d-8a17-35eac5d77006 X-Archives-Hash: e68978ab114402534c1c3b1d8654d7ba --nextPart10013186.eONJSIJfOP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 09 September 2007, Piotr Jaroszy=C5=84ski wrote: > >> if ! emake -j1 check; then > >> hasq test $FEATURES && die "Make check failed. See above for details= =2E" > >> hasq test $FEATURES || eerror "Make check failed. See above for > >> details." fi > > No reason to check for test in FEATURES, make it die uncodnitionally. a better question is, why does that function exist at all =2Dmike --nextPart10013186.eONJSIJfOP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARuRYe0FjO5/oN/WBAQJtUhAAs/tr2HaeZXHVhTochOh1Dze/j2R8tVc9 7fIcaZqXZPBB37SA+uzur2F3Ye2yhXm4C4JN47MziA3nns8oQqRe5F0jOMkiSpyU XdEs2WtbEWZ19f962oRNoN0VxN+Kyo6HuBJ+tGGFYQsxY6pGKntxJNHQgFPs+UGd Lstq+4Vog2vS4CtYKPjYJ1lZm9A6e3GGsiJ0vT+aidTYuns4pQ7Xy4YTmt+bOPSP ZKq22+BAHkyyLhQcOuMt1x7oonv0nU+DgnYGqL0FGSJI/z/x7iOUGBfytdC2Dx8E w5MIdlCajiT0yh4+xffH1C5Vv55/jRAHVYaI6KKgyXtkoDZEFJIKUhN2IrGHJHo+ v/zmIdLrohQyuoujBCwlE57Pqhgq6nyPKYhdLMzuscgrXjpTa6d6lxMQ2y8WMLfv vWyTwhyyCtQ7bKA4BEGEgLKwb3uOFBRLulfYTs7p2P5rgpuU1uB+5IU63KmgXzTD GOwqdOYq0eVxqRsd0LRN7oOHK85ol4bNrqS147AuIjNbqRJcC0qykT4B4TI6AAcg TBAtO3j94tl/MHaYPXcfbMP7HdWBw0Xq8AEppXnllZLlQDC55cbXK0kNAIxjAiR7 Vn/ZlvCrhxoPMBlZCZkWeJBgcnC79lrgnee+xKw6DBXGw/dEfQjwZiE//UWD7dg7 DTHwQ/PQtys= =+mct -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart10013186.eONJSIJfOP-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list