From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IU8DF-0007kF-5W for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2007 21:51:33 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l88Lhmra025061; Sat, 8 Sep 2007 21:43:48 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l88Lfska022801 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2007 21:41:55 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4675E64990 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2007 21:41:54 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-commits list lives! Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 17:43:27 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20070907070136.GM22695@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> <20070908140744.15324548@localhost> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1300041.XF3RZrxBhp"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200709081743.27674.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 33ea9586-5f41-4e3d-8039-55d0e7fadda4 X-Archives-Hash: 764dd4c381296992d5966ea36958d529 --nextPart1300041.XF3RZrxBhp Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 08 September 2007, Alec Warner wrote: > On 9/8/07, Christian Faulhammer wrote: > > "Robin H. Johnson" : > > > After much toiling, Infra has finally got the commits list active. > > > > Kudos to you all! > > > > What we now need is the installation of some kind of peer review. For > > example add to the recruitment guide a recommendation to watch the > > recruitee one mentored on the commits mailing list. > > All other commits should be reviewed. Arch work is normally > > done in a team and all teams watch each other, so that works quite > > good, as keywords are done wrong far too often. > > Any ideas about an efficient way to establish such a process? > > Can we see how often the list gets used first? Maybe things will > improve in the next bit of time and we don't need any extra formal > process. I have no problem adding to the guide that mentors should > watch mentees commits (that is technically already required even > though many do not). I'd rather have a bunch of people pointing out > problems on commits in an ad-hoc manner than have 'All Commits > Reviewed(TM)' ;) buy Alex a beer -mike --nextPart1300041.XF3RZrxBhp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARuMXf0FjO5/oN/WBAQLg+xAAjmSxkfIFXvlBNdzycOV3UeEjd/OlZEmD jItAxrG8p1LnNQh/I2NZYOkEoZ1vQo66pXFpi9SO9i/fpT/Ozl35xFsnOET/pCTe 3IGnziaGOJb7HCJu+JzCCXhX8PH/ZowQnztVpZ0qfZ0IMxRZ1/xPTpGO20QiwcjL Dg/Z3UxukcgGj2/udH67R069V6M7L2dOCwrf7Zuj5TmmScreprfNwCqfahk3f+y4 fSNEwGe1YTxF1bv7i7fecmL0rBjp3bwAEnKPkafBN4/vitCPL2nOwjs16+KvR0St tckvZkji2UH4/eR1WDqtbBgFFldTvf3iJWONXLbf/DfZxAZpht71j927mkDjmcCy Pb4nKCrTckwi/flhcW/zd0Xk6uHzeFvjDxtmqb+wgEPQThHPyM58VJ4vqK0ptgrx Q0MV/WjP0dKZ865BJAdpiJ2R36v77QuEzBV8lTyKt8E5fIq7ti5Ow8bR3ze54Bsw xlBvEVZW0mE7nzmKqP/VK9lBFvtPMa9yt9BVyrFzxCFZ4VYjS20zDgS9+TSrfVu/ WCO8IjTQx4uYO2zddJuBW3PDpio7LVwaJ9Nu335yXJcndbjbX68G64nt51tyylE5 KZtsAMa8LJMjfLWUnLD7VwxKNXfrjSrQPIuDYljn13UF76YrW53yGPh4Pfveo/cm C3MbT1hHhNo= =jwlC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1300041.XF3RZrxBhp-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list