* [gentoo-dev] Re: GPL violations with net-misc/vpnc? [not found] ` <5c6ef75af75c76cdeba2d248847046d0@gentoo.org> @ 2007-08-31 14:31 ` Christian Faulhammer 2007-08-31 16:18 ` Olivier Crête 2007-08-31 16:18 ` Steve Long 0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Christian Faulhammer @ 2007-08-31 14:31 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 662 bytes --] Alexis Ballier <aballier@gentoo.org>: > > While we are not distributing binaries, I could easily add a > > USE flag to enable it; the user compiles it himself, so it is all > > fine. But now regard the existence of binary hosts, are they > > distributions of then illegal binaries? > isn't bindist useflag made for this purpose ? Great. Thanks...so what is common practice? Should the ebuild die, telling people a feature will not be included or just exclude it with an ewarn only? V-Li -- Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project <URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode <URL:http://www.faulhammer.org/> [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GPL violations with net-misc/vpnc? 2007-08-31 14:31 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: GPL violations with net-misc/vpnc? Christian Faulhammer @ 2007-08-31 16:18 ` Olivier Crête 2007-08-31 16:38 ` Christian Faulhammer 2007-08-31 16:18 ` Steve Long 1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Olivier Crête @ 2007-08-31 16:18 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 798 bytes --] On Fri, 2007-31-08 at 16:31 +0200, Christian Faulhammer wrote: > Alexis Ballier <aballier@gentoo.org>: > > > > While we are not distributing binaries, I could easily add a > > > USE flag to enable it; the user compiles it himself, so it is all > > > fine. But now regard the existence of binary hosts, are they > > > distributions of then illegal binaries? > > isn't bindist useflag made for this purpose ? > > Great. Thanks...so what is common practice? Should the ebuild die, > telling people a feature will not be included or just exclude it with > an ewarn only? With bindist, you should just disable any non-distributable feature and print a ewarn.. Dieing is not nice since its used to build the stages, etc. -- Olivier Crête tester@gentoo.org Gentoo Developer [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-dev] Re: GPL violations with net-misc/vpnc? 2007-08-31 16:18 ` Olivier Crête @ 2007-08-31 16:38 ` Christian Faulhammer 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Christian Faulhammer @ 2007-08-31 16:38 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 740 bytes --] Olivier Crête <tester@gentoo.org>: > > Great. Thanks...so what is common practice? Should the ebuild > > die, telling people a feature will not be included or just exclude > > it with an ewarn only? > With bindist, you should just disable any non-distributable feature > and print a ewarn.. Dieing is not nice since its used to build the > stages, etc. Olivier, Steve, thanks. So I will just emit an ewarn in the ebuild...that way Gentoo will be the only major distribution shipping hybrid auth in vpnc. Yay! Other source based will offer it, too, though. V-Li -- Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project <URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode <URL:http://www.faulhammer.org/> [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-dev] Re: GPL violations with net-misc/vpnc? 2007-08-31 14:31 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: GPL violations with net-misc/vpnc? Christian Faulhammer 2007-08-31 16:18 ` Olivier Crête @ 2007-08-31 16:18 ` Steve Long 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Steve Long @ 2007-08-31 16:18 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev Christian Faulhammer wrote: > Alexis Ballier <aballier@gentoo.org>: > >> > While we are not distributing binaries, I could easily add a >> > USE flag to enable it; the user compiles it himself, so it is all >> > fine. But now regard the existence of binary hosts, are they >> > distributions of then illegal binaries? Definitely. IIRC distribution within an organisation doesn't count as distribution under the GPL but I am not a lawyer. (Nor do I like that acronym: my eyeballs survive reading it tho ;) Any public binhost like tinderbox[1] would be unable to make binaries available. >> isn't bindist useflag made for this purpose ? > > Great. Thanks...so what is common practice? Should the ebuild die, > telling people a feature will not be included or just exclude it with > an ewarn only? > Dunno what common practice is, but from a user perspective, it's much better if the binhost compiles without the feature than dies altogether. An ewarn/elog about bindist is sufficient for any competent admin (and newbs can search site:forums.gentoo.org or whinge on IRC, where they shall be gently enlightened ;) [1] http://tinderbox.dev.gentoo.org/html/default-linux/ -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-08-31 18:11 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- [not found] <20070831083352.62dcdde1@localhost> [not found] ` <5c6ef75af75c76cdeba2d248847046d0@gentoo.org> 2007-08-31 14:31 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: GPL violations with net-misc/vpnc? Christian Faulhammer 2007-08-31 16:18 ` Olivier Crête 2007-08-31 16:38 ` Christian Faulhammer 2007-08-31 16:18 ` Steve Long
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox