From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IHinZ-0007XH-KQ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 05 Aug 2007 16:17:46 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l75GGlrr007829; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 16:16:47 GMT Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l75GEpg6005450 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 16:14:51 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 600C28D30C for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 17:44:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13474-06 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 17:44:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from snowflake (82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk [82.41.57.20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F2538D305 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 17:44:33 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 17:14:38 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Some ideas on how to reduce territoriality Message-ID: <20070805171438.0349a238@snowflake> In-Reply-To: <1186178767.8470.47.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> References: <1186178767.8470.47.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.10.0 (GTK+ 2.10.13; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_61rUvJrM5fEASvn5cd2.t+f; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ferdyx.org X-Archives-Salt: c328c803-5bf2-4917-b782-ade272136382 X-Archives-Hash: 2af642d15d269b1f39fafc177177f00c --Sig_61rUvJrM5fEASvn5cd2.t+f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 03 Aug 2007 15:06:07 -0700 Chris Gianelloni wrote: > - arch-specific patches/dependencies - If someone is requesting > KEYWORD changes on a package and it requires a patch or additional > dependencies for your architecture, you are not only permitted, but > really are required to make the necessary changes to add support for > your architecture. arch-specific patches are almost always wrong. The last thing people need is to come along and find some arch developer has applied a bad arch-specific patch without asking first... --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_61rUvJrM5fEASvn5cd2.t+f Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGtfdu96zL6DUtXhERArfhAJ48KOEn+x89xtQehVBfNtYKdwfn3QCeMq7h W9mMLvRI/NwI9o50Rch4tPQ= =adw7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_61rUvJrM5fEASvn5cd2.t+f-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list