From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IHOSF-0004yg-0t for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2007 18:34:23 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l74IXQRv010989; Sat, 4 Aug 2007 18:33:26 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l74IVPFr008654 for ; Sat, 4 Aug 2007 18:31:27 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87F0165275 for ; Sat, 4 Aug 2007 18:31:26 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] 2.6.22 stable plans Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 14:32:14 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <46AFC734.2000702@gentoo.org> <200708030014.41719.vapier@gentoo.org> <1186248925.13234.14.camel@wlt.obsidian-studios.com> In-Reply-To: <1186248925.13234.14.camel@wlt.obsidian-studios.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1581336.3q84TU03H7"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200708041432.15011.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 462925d5-050e-431c-9e0e-6edacbef3e1f X-Archives-Hash: 4a12666ceffeb24e0a3dc813f0f1fe88 --nextPart1581336.3q84TU03H7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 04 August 2007, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 00:14 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > my point though wasnt to knock ati (although it was fun), the point was > > that i do not believe any closed source driver in our tree should ever = be > > grounds for preventing stabilization of a kernel ebuild > > Yes, I don't like that it's closed source either. But closed or open > source. It seems odd to have packages in our stable tree that don't work > with each other? Doesn't that kinda go against the point of our stable > tree? then dont stabilize the closed source packages, problem solved > I personally don't use genkernel, but I believe those updating their > systems via emerge world, and then running genkernel later against the > new kernel. Will likely have it fail, and then report bugs against our > stable tree. boy thats sure a pickle when we cant do s**t about it (maybe *this* time we= =20 can fix it, but that is not always the case) =2Dmike --nextPart1581336.3q84TU03H7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.5 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARrTGLkFjO5/oN/WBAQIoSBAAuqcyJP5SU+KlaD8gLC4oYOMbFyM9hgrm BErz4yp2Tp2EJFJ4DigTImJckxsAT+zmZyDiJdNzjnJEpjORv59p32vgprUB+NxK bRJTFToSCgAjGEOrZ/FIUYuMi+QDiFXFcELOxMflcNTW6cVpQtvQEzW2rdGUJMjJ n8ilsMOK68Ze4FK4PmhDgm4OlelfcnyEyTcwoltuved7WLQlExFY9q4dCPsjh38N s7xQg+wsKwyo+JRzE9ylCqqfqu2zvJyG0Vzpm03/BINauoBXt5TzGCaHHeH9m3xJ IbfFHnYq/fpsoXyLa70WEkZBVm6qQ5Rex8vCHwrDtwxv3kg2WvpceIxVgYp+RGZD fr3xnEilJCe0VIFMDHzk0tKGML15QNas9C7upM3lPKD1/z8cgzuisbC26SfN/KlF l/hhRRqTYPIsavFoBKNUtUNXiqP5/D0JbTURaZdZMyV8BCmlT+EXhdb1hSlJ2wx8 dGQ/akTNpaEmxs9wWy+IkmRGpuxwfhnbzDBm5Dxs2Ywd+SYeoKGSlfGSjM8VRpSw jrGv7Hh1oApViw6Ur5bJI8Sjz8kH8rTOE46yKFP7Ubh4Jg2iN0R4wee73/du+2kr XR0Ds94ZDC96DPQTwYE7Ms2xsQnVAsHCJmUaVneeJuuASAThxu41Rq7qUjmjqjWE I0wEnK6PWBg= =3SQH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1581336.3q84TU03H7-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list