From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-25519-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1IDJOw-0007b5-Oc
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:22:07 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6OCK1Lh019093;
Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:20:01 GMT
Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6OCGYtn014052
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:16:34 GMT
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 671B58D33C
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 14:04:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (tungsteno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 19953-08 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>;
Tue, 24 Jul 2007 14:03:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from snowflake (82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk [82.41.57.20])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06E048D305
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 14:03:55 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 13:16:14 +0100
From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@ciaranm.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Forbid using versions in DESCRIPTION
Message-ID: <20070724131614.0cb1593f@snowflake>
In-Reply-To: <46A5E634.3030903@gentoo.org>
References: <46A5DE60.50708@gentoo.org>
<20070724133625.065963b7@luna.home>
<46A5E634.3030903@gentoo.org>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.10.0 (GTK+ 2.10.13; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_KPbvv_fgdZnftLI87K_4x4k;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ferdyx.org
X-Archives-Salt: 578fbf18-b792-412e-9cc6-6ff65fc76914
X-Archives-Hash: 451f4de0f3573641a8513de4322b8822
--Sig_KPbvv_fgdZnftLI87K_4x4k
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 13:44:52 +0200
"Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <hkBst@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Perhaps we should just move DESCRIPTIONs to metadata. That would make
> it impossible to use ${PV} and more importantly also remove some
> duplication.
Got to be careful here. In the past it's been stated that Portage won't
use XML for anything that it has to parse.
--=20
Ciaran McCreesh
--Sig_KPbvv_fgdZnftLI87K_4x4k
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGpe2O96zL6DUtXhERAslkAKDXNaeJ6IGzzqCC6cplGLJTGWLMIQCghi8q
VGowF0JOMp8cE57N0kP2gVU=
=xLQT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Sig_KPbvv_fgdZnftLI87K_4x4k--
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list