From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-25502-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>) id 1ID95k-0002Lb-Ja for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 01:21:37 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6O1Kasb015807; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 01:20:36 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6O1HFXU010745 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 01:17:16 GMT Received: from localhost (xray.science.oregonstate.edu [128.193.220.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04F236507E; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 01:17:15 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 18:17:11 -0700 From: Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: wolf31o2@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: joining the Software Freedom Conservancy Message-ID: <20070723181711.7cceec65@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1185239030.8799.37.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> References: <1184349298.8347.42.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> <1184619644.15799.37.camel@hangover.linbsd.net> <20070717150823.GD13456@feynman.corp.halliburton.com> <20070717193847.c6c3428f.genone@gentoo.org> <f808rt$qcd$2@sea.gmane.org> <1185222971.8799.20.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> <46A51849.2070804@gentoo.org> <1185239030.8799.37.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.14; powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_GJkrTQHInoTHBhnSqeWOUN="; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 046901e1-a550-41cf-b982-3f4097312d19 X-Archives-Hash: b7d65b68151b3346edcab31f12f216b4 --Sig_GJkrTQHInoTHBhnSqeWOUN= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 18:03:50 -0700 Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 14:06 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > > Well, we'd be the second distribution, as Debian uses the SFC. > > > Also, realize that we've already gone through all of this with > > > the SFC and wouldn't even be bringing it up as an option if the > > > SFC hadn't already approved us. They are aware of the state of > > > our tree and that we do ship *ebuilds* for proprietary software. > > > Remember that we don't distribute closed-source software, we > > > distribute *ebuilds* for said software. > >=20 > > Are you sure we don't mirror any binary software or non-free > > software? I would be shocked if our mirrors contained nothing > > violating the open-source definition. >=20 > We have lots that violates "open source" by any definition, but we > don't create it. I completely agree with you. But the part quoted by Ryan Hill doesn't say created. It says distributed. Perhaps we need to modify the wording of their standard agreement to reflect how distributions work. Thanks, Donnie --Sig_GJkrTQHInoTHBhnSqeWOUN= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGpVMXXVaO67S1rtsRAlk9AKDP1rvGoniBs0IgqWar0oyqtt8ttwCfQvkD jVI/vx88GwvsDYPiMkuKwNM= =LIyM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_GJkrTQHInoTHBhnSqeWOUN=-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list