From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1ICMRW-00059J-Il for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 21:24:51 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6LLNrGO026904; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 21:23:53 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6LLM20N024651 for ; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 21:22:03 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4245D650C9 for ; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 21:21:55 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-2 stablisation plans Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 17:22:09 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <1185028563.2490.22.camel@uberpc.marples.name> <1185049694.2490.50.camel@uberpc.marples.name> <1185052160.2490.52.camel@uberpc.marples.name> In-Reply-To: <1185052160.2490.52.camel@uberpc.marples.name> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1229803.pUYJyfqzJ0"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200707211722.10417.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 8f617e83-661a-4bcd-a366-710ff6855c41 X-Archives-Hash: 03d35403ea5c3d0927281510d6e5f83d --nextPart1229803.pUYJyfqzJ0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 21 July 2007, Roy Marples wrote: > On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 21:28 +0100, Roy Marples wrote: > > On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 22:22 +0200, Tobias Klausmann wrote: > > > Is there a common bug to report snags to? I've hit one: > > > /etc/init.d/net.eth0 used to be a symlink to net.lo. After > > > installing, it was gone (I figure it went with baselayout-1). > > > Luckily, I have direct console access, otherwise the machine > > > would have been gone after the reboot. Definitely something to > > > yell about during merging. > > > > We don't ship with net.eth0 because there is no guarantee an interface > > called eth0 exists. net.lo (net.lo0 in *BSDs) always exists so we just > > ship that. > > One very good idea would be to get udev to create any net links that do > not exist to net.lo > > Then we truly have plug and play :) indeed, that'd be sleeky and sexy ... go file a bug ;) -mike --nextPart1229803.pUYJyfqzJ0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.5 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARqJ5AkFjO5/oN/WBAQL5MQ/+KrEerEryqRqlxP1xDK/4922m0XxCFOWE YPdT3Xse7uHVHh111UETAnfxDHc7NRmb2sAmFwqhqQRprOdpaKyKEj3ZafNCn1Xu SBWb3Zd2RfhYk0+3Prhm7C+e3UsjG9vrTAX3/DnsS0YqfY8OtS4pyMUwEfuQChjD 3zVCjmjwc11ta9aTR1v9RidX0xHo1WWGIsKvmILJrHityQtcjgLl+glu/UoNdilI 0D1cflwYN5omY4F6gItsC9yT2irmv58yDl6uIY/m9Z0/NLqlXtMIu4wOa57CVPt3 Bku0XshtXGRxfBhBK6b6gAPaSuBi6zEdbsyRqhSQrCIjDWJ6fSAY1bc14OLF408h 3OuWFfLyoi2mPAZQQjuxnYdhPnabw5sa1/a+1yoRog3y8lbhBhMTuhbMy6Fpea5h ZibcC2YcLzCgv7RzZ+mul9NlQKHk8favulWcNqBS/0+dEFNZgEtBSDD2R9OGLl4d rTAe/v+Vh7zcU1B6bjEz2L/ERkF4XBVg4kDKSLsHs9pHPGG5wbL1fVG8oWvBb18u dXYhZZHhIFHpfsVUADg9FFKz59dNl6D6Ar/aU7qF9u34rM45s+Vgj84OE018/dBR P/rBFlFW8/i/ljHCpyoznkx/O5e9v6n+mgoNF4bbyEzpYu9TsrQyGwtLHXObzcFL qHl2ULU33kA= =kate -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1229803.pUYJyfqzJ0-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list