From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-25292-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1IBD1M-0001Lr-MC
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2007 17:09:05 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6IH6lqZ016494;
	Wed, 18 Jul 2007 17:06:47 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6IH3aIC012565
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 18 Jul 2007 17:03:37 GMT
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B132565254
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 18 Jul 2007 17:03:35 +0000 (UTC)
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Organization: wh0rd.org
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] x86 toolchain changes heads up
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 13:04:44 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7
References: <200707171947.14598.vapier@gentoo.org> <1184748819.9888.8.camel@tuxhugs>
In-Reply-To: <1184748819.9888.8.camel@tuxhugs>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <200707181304.45211.vapier@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart15415154.DTXVhoJ2vK";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 792fa117-49ef-4933-a96d-ab8a35e284bf
X-Archives-Hash: 2656db52f4f8f0a7bb5226b9b38b6298

--nextPart15415154.DTXVhoJ2vK
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-6"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On Wednesday 18 July 2007, Peter Gordon wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 19:47 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > historically, gcc on x86 has always defaulted to i386.  some people
> > noticed recently that glibc-2.6 fails to build in this situation as they
> > were only setting -mtune via CFLAGS, not -march.  i'll be tweaking gcc so
> > that it will default -march based on your CHOST.  so all the i686-*
> > people will now have a default -march=i686 implied in their gcc systems,
> > i586-* people will have -march=i586, etc...  keep in mind this is merely
> > the default. -mike
>
> Does this mean that any user-set "-march" flag is overridden for these
> cases? Just curious.

*cough* keep in mind this is merely the default *cough*
-mike

--nextPart15415154.DTXVhoJ2vK
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
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=A7YE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart15415154.DTXVhoJ2vK--
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list