From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1IAlBv-0003gU-Ip for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:26:08 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6HBOXFE012279; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:24:33 GMT Received: from mo-p07-ob.rzone.de (mo-p07-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.190]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6HBKD6o005394 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:20:13 GMT Received: from oct.local.devrieze.net ([210.1.194.130]) by post.webmailer.de (mrclete mo43) (RZmta 8.3) with ESMTP id Q00283j6H99Jcf for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:20:11 +0200 (MEST) From: Paul de Vrieze To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ML changes Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 21:20:09 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <46968E00.4070202@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200707172120.09396.pauldv@gentoo.org> X-RZG-AUTH: kl51CIkHMwISfnYDoiNJgMuHR/Blg5MDmwdH0Ia0PPOPtvsc0k7H31tk X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo07 X-Archives-Salt: e6237a1a-e3ad-416f-a14f-63c5bfc63a02 X-Archives-Hash: 4d30ab7ffe72febc339363d867c761a3 On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:11:19 Duncan wrote: > Ryan Hill posted f76iu0$j6u$1@sea.gmane.org, > > excerpted below, on Thu, 12 Jul 2007 19:01:53 -0600: > > Why don't we create the gentoo-project mailing > > list, and, you know, actually wait a bit to see how that actually goes. > > Then we can talk about how best to handle -dev. One shit at a time, > > people. > > +1 > > It should also be noted that it's council election time, and I don't > believe a change such as closing -dev to moderated write status is really > urgent enough to have the outgoing council handle. Let the folks running > for council now make their positions part of their platforms, and after - > project is up and running for a couple months and the new council is in > place, /then/ let's see if moderating -dev remains a burning enough issue > to be voted on. I agree with you that this should be pulled over the election. That will also allow some time to see how the -project list works out. Paul -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list