* Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: For Jakub (and the other procmail-impaired)
2007-07-17 1:52 ` Steve Long
@ 2007-07-17 2:05 ` George Prowse
2007-07-17 2:06 ` George Prowse
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: George Prowse @ 2007-07-17 2:05 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Steve Long wrote:
> Perhaps you'd like to explain just how Mr Gianelloni's post was NOT a troll
> then? Or is every developer's procmail setting (particularly for such a
> stupid thread) a matter we should all be discussing? It's not like amne
> never pointed out, several mails ago, that the whole thread had been done
> to death or anything, is it?
>
> And no, I don't like being lumped in with Mr McCreesh.
>
>
Mate, chill out. We've all had our say and everyone is keeping quiet.
Methinks that is the best idea now for everyone involved in this
subject. Capiche?
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: For Jakub (and the other procmail-impaired)
2007-07-17 1:52 ` Steve Long
2007-07-17 2:05 ` George Prowse
@ 2007-07-17 2:06 ` George Prowse
2007-07-17 2:49 ` Vlastimil Babka
2007-07-17 19:02 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: For Jakub (and the other procmail-impaired) Chris Gianelloni
3 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: George Prowse @ 2007-07-17 2:06 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Steve Long wrote:
> Perhaps you'd like to explain just how Mr Gianelloni's post was NOT a troll
> then? Or is every developer's procmail setting (particularly for such a
> stupid thread) a matter we should all be discussing? It's not like amne
> never pointed out, several mails ago, that the whole thread had been done
> to death or anything, is it?
>
> And no, I don't like being lumped in with Mr McCreesh.
>
>
Mate, chill out. We've all had our say and everyone is keeping quiet.
Methinks that is the best idea now for everyone involved in this
subject. Capiche?
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: For Jakub (and the other procmail-impaired)
2007-07-17 1:52 ` Steve Long
2007-07-17 2:05 ` George Prowse
2007-07-17 2:06 ` George Prowse
@ 2007-07-17 2:49 ` Vlastimil Babka
2007-07-17 6:47 ` [gentoo-dev] alternative solution for 'procmail-impaired' folks Jakub Moc
2007-07-17 19:02 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: For Jakub (and the other procmail-impaired) Chris Gianelloni
3 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Vlastimil Babka @ 2007-07-17 2:49 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Steve Long wrote:
> And no, I don't like being lumped in with Mr McCreesh.
Why would anyone do that? His trolling is sophisticated, but you're just
an annoying spammer.
- --
Vlastimil Babka (Caster)
Gentoo/Java
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGnC4+tbrAj05h3oQRAogfAJsHwaCR8rOhveFWrmODgKheBHPTyQCgjx1G
uhvlN37SxRrUWS9MaRoIMis=
=s82z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] alternative solution for 'procmail-impaired' folks
2007-07-17 2:49 ` Vlastimil Babka
@ 2007-07-17 6:47 ` Jakub Moc
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Moc @ 2007-07-17 6:47 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1450 bytes --]
Vlastimil Babka napsal(a):
> Steve Long wrote:
>> And no, I don't like being lumped in with Mr McCreesh.
>
> Why would anyone do that? His trolling is sophisticated, but you're just
> an annoying spammer.
Can we please stop this direction? My ZOMG was there to share my
frustration from getting my mailbox flooded by stuff I'm totally not
interested in and which has nothing to do with gentoo *development*.
For less sucky ways of expressing similar feelings as mine, please refer
to http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_131667.xml - sadly, the
picture is gone now :(
To bring this debate back on track - the current council proposal
*fails* to address the real problem: people should not be required to be
subscribed to gentoo-dev (moderated or non-moderated) and important
announcements should be directed to a different (IMO read-only) list.
Why don't we use current gentoo-announce list for seems to exist for
this exact purpose? In that way, people who wish to participate in
on-topic, off-topic or straight retarded debates would still have the
choice to do so, while not forcing the majority of others to 'mark
folder as read' every 6 hours.
TIA.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:jakub@gentoo.org
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
... still no signature ;)
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: For Jakub (and the other procmail-impaired)
2007-07-17 1:52 ` Steve Long
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2007-07-17 2:49 ` Vlastimil Babka
@ 2007-07-17 19:02 ` Chris Gianelloni
3 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Chris Gianelloni @ 2007-07-17 19:02 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 738 bytes --]
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 02:52 +0100, Steve Long wrote:
> Perhaps you'd like to explain just how Mr Gianelloni's post was NOT a troll
> then? Or is every developer's procmail setting (particularly for such a
> stupid thread) a matter we should all be discussing? It's not like amne
> never pointed out, several mails ago, that the whole thread had been done
> to death or anything, is it?
>
> And no, I don't like being lumped in with Mr McCreesh.
How exactly is the technical answer to a technical question (from Jakub,
about how to avoid the thread) a troll?
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread