From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1I9yPs-00014c-EZ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 15 Jul 2007 07:21:16 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6F7IKGK028994; Sun, 15 Jul 2007 07:18:20 GMT Received: from home.coming.dk (3305ds1-ar.0.fullrate.dk [90.185.22.159]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6F7E8ws021646 for ; Sun, 15 Jul 2007 07:14:08 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost.fullrate.dk [127.0.0.1]) by home.coming.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 821FBB152 for ; Sun, 15 Jul 2007 09:14:30 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at home.coming.dk Received: from home.coming.dk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (littlelaughs.home.coming.dk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 9atbWwHGrMLF for ; Sun, 15 Jul 2007 09:14:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from seaeyes (unknown [192.168.2.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jaervosz@coming.dk) by home.coming.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA4E92ED for ; Sun, 15 Jul 2007 09:13:56 +0200 (CEST) From: Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ML changes Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 09:14:28 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <46968E00.4070202@gentoo.org> <6A752AC1698E43C28C8DEFEFF0562BB8@twi31o2.org> <20070713011753.658cf79f.genone@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20070713011753.658cf79f.genone@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Linux Security Team Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200707150914.28746.jaervosz@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 03c3e70f-80de-4c64-94d6-724816a880a2 X-Archives-Hash: 8b4e3df4a4e138a6f9e0efcdbb4ccf1f On Friday 13 July 2007 01:17, Marius Mauch wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:43:59 -0700 > > "Chrissy Fullam" wrote: > > An additional method discussed was to have all non-dev emails on > > a timeout, pick a number of hours, and then the email if not > > moderated would be released. (non-dev sends his email, time period > > expires and no one booted it, so the email rolls through) > > For what it's worth, _IF_ this proposal goes through I'd strongly prefer > that mode of operation, so that moderation can't become a limiting > factor. > > Marius > > PS: Am I the only one who missed both reminders for the meeting? No, I missed them and the meeting as well:-( Before I recently joined the council I was against implementing the Proctors but now that we they apparently have been disbanded I think we're better off with an open -dev than some form of moderation. Flamefest contributors should be temporarily blacklisted. We can have a -dev-announce or -dev-info for devs that don't want to wade through all the mails here on -dev. We still need -core for private communications and need input on -dev from non-devs. As a very busy person I wouldn't want the extra burden of moderating emails to -dev. /me smacks himself for missing the meeting -- Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen Gentoo Linux Security Team -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list