From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-25035-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1I9TFU-0003pH-BF
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 22:04:28 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6DM3Wxd015698;
	Fri, 13 Jul 2007 22:03:32 GMT
Received: from dspnet.fr.eu.org (dspnet.fr.eu.org [213.186.44.138])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6DM0t3m012057
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 22:00:56 GMT
Received: by dspnet.fr.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1007)
	id F22A7A3553; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 00:00:55 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 00:00:55 +0200
From: Olivier Galibert <galibert@pobox.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Smoother moderation scheme? (was: ML changes)
Message-ID: <20070713220055.GA63326@dspnet.fr.eu.org>
References: <46968E00.4070202@gentoo.org> <1184356016.6766.1200057851@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1184356016.6766.1200057851@webmail.messagingengine.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
X-Archives-Salt: dd2e34aa-95d1-41e9-9d67-d53ab2e5f060
X-Archives-Hash: 219bf416687879f37130b49eb501efcb

On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 03:46:56PM -0400, Thomas Tuttle wrote:
> Questions?  Comments?

You're going to have a hell of a fun time to answer the question of
how a post is judged "good" or "spam".

  OG.
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list