From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-25000-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>) id 1I9M9u-0002ZL-Hx for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:30:15 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6DET90F029948; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:29:09 GMT Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6DEQuOW027429 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:26:56 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BAC48D35A for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 16:21:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21115-03 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 16:20:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from snowflake (82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk [82.41.57.20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A4F8D30C for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 16:20:54 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:26:31 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@ciaranm.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ML changes Message-ID: <20070713152631.29c2329d@snowflake> In-Reply-To: <1184336040.32429.6.camel@wlt.obsidian-studios.com> References: <46968E00.4070202@gentoo.org> <1184308886.9892.48.camel@tuxhugs> <1184310715.26227.29.camel@localhost> <1184336040.32429.6.camel@wlt.obsidian-studios.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_.uY1ZZp6HIfEN6/IWB+F/5T"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ferdyx.org X-Archives-Salt: 25b3e53b-2e59-45d5-9041-9c99c2bbd9dc X-Archives-Hash: 320bf5c08b123e14c504ac37fa0a77c2 --Sig_.uY1ZZp6HIfEN6/IWB+F/5T Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 10:14:00 -0400 "William L. Thomson Jr." <wltjr@gentoo.org> wrote: > I consider it growing up. Do we want businesses to run and base their > service/product offerings on Gentoo? If so we must take it seriously. > Otherwise we are just a hobby distro for the uber geeks. If you want businesses to use Gentoo, you need to start offering things that make Gentoo a better solution than other distributions. That, first and foremost, means technical improvements, an area upon which Gentoo is most definitely not focused right now. > What makes a developer only -dev list any different than developers > only having a voice on #gentoo-dev? The former is where development discussion is supposed to take place. The latter is a social convenience. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_.uY1ZZp6HIfEN6/IWB+F/5T Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGl4uX96zL6DUtXhERAvX2AJ9tPDBKHe3sA/vaPRfvDf/R0KO9+ACfcNay 7xWdU8pY0BFm5nqy3EpoB54= =ixhc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_.uY1ZZp6HIfEN6/IWB+F/5T-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list