From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1I9804-0001xN-9P for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 23:23:08 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6CNLQtr013737; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 23:21:26 GMT Received: from mail.genone.homeip.net (dslc-082-082-180-090.pools.arcor-ip.net [82.82.180.90]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6CNIdqB010292 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 23:18:40 GMT Received: by mail.genone.homeip.net (Postfix, from userid 460) id 2592828113; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 01:17:44 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8-gr0-genone_0.7 (2007-02-13) on lyta.genone.homeip.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=7.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50 autolearn=ham version=3.1.8-gr0-genone_0.7 Received: from sheridan (sheridan [192.168.0.40]) by mail.genone.homeip.net (Postfix) with SMTP id D336628113 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 01:17:42 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 01:17:53 +0200 From: Marius Mauch To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ML changes Message-Id: <20070713011753.658cf79f.genone@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <6A752AC1698E43C28C8DEFEFF0562BB8@twi31o2.org> References: <46968E00.4070202@gentoo.org> <6A752AC1698E43C28C8DEFEFF0562BB8@twi31o2.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i686-pc-mingw32) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 8006e94f-93ba-4616-8357-476b274181ae X-Archives-Hash: 43fdbc0f7cfa84c9b58cbc6610138d9b On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:43:59 -0700 "Chrissy Fullam" wrote: > An additional method discussed was to have all non-dev emails on > a timeout, pick a number of hours, and then the email if not > moderated would be released. (non-dev sends his email, time period > expires and no one booted it, so the email rolls through) For what it's worth, _IF_ this proposal goes through I'd strongly prefer that mode of operation, so that moderation can't become a limiting factor. Marius PS: Am I the only one who missed both reminders for the meeting? -- Marius Mauch -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list