From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1I94iz-0003ls-Nz for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 19:53:18 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6CJqKcY007437; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 19:52:20 GMT Received: from blob.mailstation.de (ftp.mailstation.de [87.139.47.139]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6CJoOGM005235 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 19:50:25 GMT Received: from janus.mailstation.de (janus.mailstation.de [192.168.168.10]) by blob.mailstation.de (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l6CJortr022613 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 21:50:56 +0200 From: "Wulf C. Krueger" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Watch out for license changes to GPL-3. Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 21:48:05 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <4690C4B8.4000407@gentoo.org> <20070712200736.2a79eaff@snowflake> <1184267678.26227.9.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1184267678.26227.9.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2554122.21dteg8sv0"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200707122148.05660.philantrop@gentoo.org> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (blob.mailstation.de [192.168.168.30]); Thu, 12 Jul 2007 21:50:56 +0200 (CEST) X-mailstation-de-MailScanner-Information: Scanned using: F-Prot, ClamAv, Bitdefender X-mailstation-de-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-mailstation-de-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-1.44, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44) X-mailstation-de-MailScanner-From: philantrop@gentoo.org X-mailstation-de-MailScanner-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Archives-Salt: a04524aa-2366-42d4-a1b4-bcfdc6c3bd31 X-Archives-Hash: df75ebded6d0f11c73bd8da7fcbe066e --nextPart2554122.21dteg8sv0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday, 12. July 2007 21:14:38 Seemant Kulleen wrote: > It would be an interesting question, though, to prove that someone > wrote a from-scratch ebuild via looking only at the documentation, and > without basing any parts off of already existing ebuilds in the tree, > no? How many angels can dance on the head of a needle? [1] Seriously, guys...=20 *Did* some Gentoo dev commit an ebuild licenced under GPL-3? *Did* some user attach an ebuild licenced under GPL-3 to a bug? Best regards, Wulf [1] The definitive answer, btw, was found by Professor Raoul Mortley: "The= =20 answer is of course well known; fewer if fat, more if thin". --nextPart2554122.21dteg8sv0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGloV1nuVXRcSi+5oRAtssAKCRBRu0F4xckLEflF5kyoOiusnPrQCdH7t3 wEh35ztmmBn5LRXzVMhPF6w= =7pD0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2554122.21dteg8sv0-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list