From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-24914-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>) id 1I95BH-0006jj-IC for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 20:22:32 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6CKKsLB032417; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 20:20:54 GMT Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6CKHSdj027421 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 20:17:29 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 269EB8D35A for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 22:12:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05075-10 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 22:12:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from snowflake (82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk [82.41.57.20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C3698D30C for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 22:12:29 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 21:16:59 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@ciaranm.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Watch out for license changes to GPL-3. Message-ID: <20070712211659.2a1f1aa5@snowflake> In-Reply-To: <200707121610.48499.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <4690C4B8.4000407@gentoo.org> <200707121500.14681.vapier@gentoo.org> <20070712200736.2a79eaff@snowflake> <200707121610.48499.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_ZsLcGYWWhmcUfBuR4VNjlzh; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ferdyx.org X-Archives-Salt: 0845e556-3caa-42fa-8674-efc19fc7b527 X-Archives-Hash: 51c76b165d1ed57def3abc36e14a8cae --Sig_ZsLcGYWWhmcUfBuR4VNjlzh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 16:10:48 -0400 Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Thursday 12 July 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > > Which feelings are clearly wrong, for anyone with any degree of > > > > familiarity with ebuilds. > > > > > > perhaps, but in the larger scheme of things, irrelevant > > > > Unless there are third party repositories shipping their own > > from-scratch ebuilds... >=20 > why would Gentoo care two licks about ebuilds in third party > repositories ... this is just pointless pondering Because if they're derived works from skel.ebuild as wolf31o2 is claiming, then there are both copyright and licence requirements imposed upon them. If this is the case, there are people out there in violation, some of whom would likely take extremely strong issue with the "derived works" argument... --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_ZsLcGYWWhmcUfBuR4VNjlzh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGlow796zL6DUtXhERAksOAJ9bSt14fANbzldQu7Fr6/nu6jttQQCgjC2T tsg6bcX3vWBE2Cs/DP8s06w= =WBsj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_ZsLcGYWWhmcUfBuR4VNjlzh-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list