From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1I95vH-0006FI-QC for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 21:10:04 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6CL98EL025600; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 21:09:08 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6CL5xkq021121 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 21:06:00 GMT Received: from ip6-localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1749B6596E for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 21:05:59 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Watch out for license changes to GPL-3. Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 17:06:05 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <4690C4B8.4000407@gentoo.org> <200707121610.48499.vapier@gentoo.org> <20070712211659.2a1f1aa5@snowflake> In-Reply-To: <20070712211659.2a1f1aa5@snowflake> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1664162.7JVzGVFJoL"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200707121706.06405.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 503d18b8-5c69-4ff3-9707-58bac5f5508f X-Archives-Hash: e605c3d9efbeceb060c22e16673e1ba4 --nextPart1664162.7JVzGVFJoL Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 12 July 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 16:10:48 -0400 > > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Thursday 12 July 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > > > Which feelings are clearly wrong, for anyone with any degree of > > > > > familiarity with ebuilds. > > > > > > > > perhaps, but in the larger scheme of things, irrelevant > > > > > > Unless there are third party repositories shipping their own > > > from-scratch ebuilds... > > > > why would Gentoo care two licks about ebuilds in third party > > repositories ... this is just pointless pondering > > Because if they're derived works from skel.ebuild as wolf31o2 is > claiming, then there are both copyright and licence requirements imposed > upon them. If this is the case, there are people out there in > violation, some of whom would likely take extremely strong issue with > the "derived works" argument... blah blah blah it's a stupid argument third parties are free to license however they like. anything in the Gento= o=20 portage tree has to have a header the same as skel.ebuild. =2Dmike --nextPart1664162.7JVzGVFJoL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.5 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARpaXvkFjO5/oN/WBAQIe/g/5ARHyT2yVvUZJT5a5gqyxxxC9TsQVaNx8 fHWtxgYx3sUlMIbZ923mDcdFlmSPz3hgisU7nTxizVqbZ/dGJ6bc7VUj+Oq/l9Qr wVZodRJTAvdhywQa8J7g4izBWawer7LRVPs0lQBpBbPOv9g0OI1aa/MuV10yb6n9 THkZqMUl8FlYxoE/gjPdXlFT64KfGFnbh0AacGgMDnULe+QD5JOJNi+R/TYf0Jo6 TlzApxdV7SJPe1fb0zWKpxfYExGiats96YJrnPfIDXVfRKs2rZZ0SnTxokiIMegm l7TmisTZcrTs8XfCAsm1BNVC5iXPvgPcMsT261VnA4eMIpm4qKIa6RlDPslymfaF 5mLKl+2qZ2Mb41gEMrvf5Dm3/Mj1wlOyH5R3DeuZP15pUSqU1L+ALz0UPElQgqvn DMwc5pPA2/zxKff776HTXA8Nk8ci8IuR0JovlbK9auugT2vNChchz6f17OqUwXLs mTI97wJtv14owg0xDJ3WNmIIKaibe/fPij+qh/fA/rSlkWxoHTMa0ZoJbEPSkrd+ IyT20ABJ5rKC4ebRiQ81NqZG4PjS1uwFmi9/BVJOvA7TgwgJmlfGie7g9f1ftRSV BDl2mpFPj4cyjvLL703JL1rsOGVMHKu8jf2qhE3djY9zdsKWB9YSsfxsiDYBnRoN gHtbkPU2is8= =eCmf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1664162.7JVzGVFJoL-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list