From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1I93wg-0006Y1-OB for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 19:03:23 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6CJ2Oq4019771; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 19:02:24 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6CJ09HX017079 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 19:00:09 GMT Received: from ip6-localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6302C65816 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 19:00:08 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Watch out for license changes to GPL-3. Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:00:14 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <4690C4B8.4000407@gentoo.org> <1184264665.8615.4.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> <20070712193146.694917f6@snowflake> In-Reply-To: <20070712193146.694917f6@snowflake> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart51518285.ZU55PYAYtQ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200707121500.14681.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: fe9ab4ac-ab49-4268-b42f-5dbcfaf7d55a X-Archives-Hash: 342754ec5ba34996806cfb31f96c9a64 --nextPart51518285.ZU55PYAYtQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 12 July 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 10:18 +0100, Steve Long wrote: > > > Or is it `acceptable' for me to put GPLv3 on, say, an ebuild I > > > wrote from scratch? > > > > The point is that we don't feel that you *can* write an ebuild "from > > scratch" since it will require certain components, which we feel > > require you to base your ebuild on skel.ebuild instead. > > Which feelings are clearly wrong, for anyone with any degree of > familiarity with ebuilds. perhaps, but in the larger scheme of things, irrelevant either Gentoo goes GPL-3 or not at all ... having ebuilds with mixed licens= es=20 is doomed to failure unless there is a pressing need for Gentoo to go GPL-3 (and i dont think=20 anyone has stated any where it'd matter to Gentoo), there isnt much point=20 right now i dont think =2Dmike --nextPart51518285.ZU55PYAYtQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.5 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARpZ6PkFjO5/oN/WBAQIP7BAAhD/14lZxUXQNkgq1UB1hmwufCVKNY9rI 0nYUmJAtzyp4hheyIcsfFwUTB95xXKVkTkkO9to1BeV0qsFeAY/J5mavdSOCTLJz ZSpIRd7ZWMCCP/I9e5ADIDt4wv5HayOM+buCCj6jFe0eSkSeXnG1CaGtwAsDMVQn 2ZovFpnFXvZxrvn1G5Hnoz7DQNOEmE+RHptfOYyy9zU/G7KI1cllxQGU8pcRYSPu EgRuWpxzlugB1kACTd9kM7+miOqzr/nlfDX00KIm5hLRoAWX/6ugfIZx7CKWQmKL ea3XAcBZ1SGJTnxtFDtc7OMLZ72P1tNHasMXBsnSCr7s7ZRyUAOyScB6TTSGRuS/ 2YNWyuq+sOSHENCp+gp3L6AAiBTs3A4Ex0fzBY1Zh2Ytl0a8o1HDhBKFhVSklUVt RuvYzgsd7L9ZsFi4OGmXUnJMnVmKQc95UEgyzSt8Ejld/EUvO5fVRoklQytvttkG /f9q5FX4NXivGETJu20AJBHaBCRz8ZquY8YIx5yTW9nJ1grYhwmPMo1PYrZjaw8Q 1NxhdS0aEExZzlW0wIJMTdfJgdrfxBHveCdBJbOL0K6YsFOakBga/QNayvd4CwnF 3q5bIMkRyY2z2N0ooMaPUwa/PmQs38Dp7NVICNkoiURgWvMqNwJE3l/ipClL03Nu snADlutGyyg= =BeLz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart51518285.ZU55PYAYtQ-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list