From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-24873-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1I8Jcq-0001zR-Rc
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:35:49 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6AHYmTb011184;
	Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:34:48 GMT
Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6AHX02a008967
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:33:00 GMT
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D63208D3F7
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:31:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (tungsteno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 27203-05 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>;
	Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:31:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from snowflake (82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk [82.41.57.20])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 012C78D30C
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:30:43 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:32:04 +0100
From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@ciaranm.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] should we do an EAPI bump now with features
 that are already implemented?
Message-ID: <20070710183204.074b4a98@snowflake>
In-Reply-To: <4693C163.2020204@gentoo.org>
References: <4692B388.9030604@gentoo.org>
	<4692B68E.6040808@gentoo.org>
	<4693AD47.3060501@gentoo.org>
	<4693B8E7.9080602@gentoo.org>
	<20070710181452.3e0971a2@snowflake>
	<4693C163.2020204@gentoo.org>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_WwKMXTMhDk.Mig+tWT.NPXM;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ferdyx.org
X-Archives-Salt: 1599442c-70ac-46dc-b855-671ec7e2a2b9
X-Archives-Hash: 265f14698d25ba0582f8797a4ec410ff

--Sig_WwKMXTMhDk.Mig+tWT.NPXM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 20:26:59 +0300
Petteri R=C3=A4ty <betelgeuse@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Written maybe but it should be discussed on gentoo-dev too I would
> give a week or two at least.

Well, I believe the idea here was to get out the already-implemented,
already-agreed-upon, highly useful, low cost stuff as soon as possible.
Hence slot deps... There's no technical reason for slot deps not to be
available right now.

--=20
Ciaran McCreesh


--Sig_WwKMXTMhDk.Mig+tWT.NPXM
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGk8KU96zL6DUtXhERAmwmAJ4298sqr0NuEqSJaYbdZB+7U3BXZQCg4rl+
MlijnaHMG6ZQRbfeS5AM5wk=
=JCyS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_WwKMXTMhDk.Mig+tWT.NPXM--
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list