From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1I8JNJ-0007CQ-Gj for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:19:45 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6AHIhN6002078; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:18:43 GMT Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6AHFDKG029132 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:15:14 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8001C8D3F7 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:13:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26613-09 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:13:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from snowflake (82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk [82.41.57.20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B19E98D30C for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:13:22 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:14:52 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] should we do an EAPI bump now with features that are already implemented? Message-ID: <20070710181452.3e0971a2@snowflake> In-Reply-To: <4693B8E7.9080602@gentoo.org> References: <4692B388.9030604@gentoo.org> <4692B68E.6040808@gentoo.org> <4693AD47.3060501@gentoo.org> <4693B8E7.9080602@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_i2.O3rnIoaT5FVzhhZsGIvy; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ferdyx.org X-Archives-Salt: be5ba354-6dd8-4ad0-8c79-86c84e4baee4 X-Archives-Hash: e6be03d1b1008774055d0ed822c62a0b --Sig_i2.O3rnIoaT5FVzhhZsGIvy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:50:47 +0300 Petteri R=C3=A4ty wrote: > Well thinking that it will get some time to write the EAPI-1 spec and > getting it approved by the council it will be probably useful to put > it in initially and see where Portage is when it comes time to vote. If EAPI-1 is slot deps and IUSE defaults, the spec can easily be done within a day. PMS is written to allow additions of that nature to be done trivially. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_i2.O3rnIoaT5FVzhhZsGIvy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGk76M96zL6DUtXhERAlfvAJ9ipqItAyvzOUKIDT/AcJABMvl+UgCeJMq3 OGvC7pvBE+vx4rlFCcWN8Ps= =uVww -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_i2.O3rnIoaT5FVzhhZsGIvy-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list